Message boards :
Number crunching :
All Milkyway@Home 1.02 tasks ending in computation error on HD6950.
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 09 Posts: 300 Credit: 303,583,740 RAC: 668 |
I'm also gettting Computation error for all the M@H projects. Any solutions to this? I only see one error from an n-body task. It is nothing to worry about. If it is the "validation inconclusive" tasks you are concerned about, do not be. They will validate when another cruncher verifies your result. |
Send message Joined: 20 Feb 14 Posts: 6 Credit: 20,780,697 RAC: 0 |
No, on the event log it says the "Computational task for blablabla has finished". But on the progress bar where it should say "100%", it shows "error". This happens for all M@H tasks. The other projects are just fine. |
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 09 Posts: 300 Credit: 303,583,740 RAC: 668 |
Can you post the lines from the Event Log? |
Send message Joined: 8 Feb 08 Posts: 261 Credit: 104,050,322 RAC: 0 |
Your actual result list shows no errors for modified fit 1.28, no errors for n-body 1.40 and no errors for mw 1.02. ... boinc keeps running as a service. Do not run boinc as a service. This might be the cause that you are seeing a confused local client showing errors while the results are valid. |
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 09 Posts: 300 Credit: 303,583,740 RAC: 668 |
Do not run boinc as a service. This might be the cause that you are seeing a confused local client showing errors while the results are valid. I was wondering about that but I've never run Boinc as a service so I didn't want to comment about it. |
Send message Joined: 20 Feb 14 Posts: 6 Credit: 20,780,697 RAC: 0 |
The event logs doesn't says much... 21/02/2014 17:24:57 | Milkyway@Home | Starting task ps_separation_10_2s_sSgrFreeInertia_4_1392810302_699245_0 21/02/2014 17:26:05 | Milkyway@Home | Computation for task ps_separation_10_2s_sSgrFreeInertia_4_1392810302_699245_0 finished 21/02/2014 17:26:05 | Milkyway@Home | Starting task de_nbody_02_12_sim_orphan_narrow_3_1392144420_116204_3 21/02/2014 17:27:19 | Milkyway@Home | Computation for task de_nbody_02_12_sim_orphan_narrow_3_1392144420_116204_3 finished 21/02/2014 17:31:01 | Milkyway@Home | Starting task ps_separation_10_2s_sSgrFreeInertia_4_1392810302_699243_0 21/02/2014 17:32:09 | Milkyway@Home | Computation for task ps_separation_10_2s_sSgrFreeInertia_4_1392810302_699243_0 finished The status bar is not '100%' (is 'ERROR'), and the tasks are uploaded. I don't think the problem is because of "running as service"; look my computers below. Comp. quarto is not running as service, and it works! Comp. PCCASA is running as service, and it works! Comp. sala is the computer in question, running as service, the tasks are finishing with ERROR, and I don't get points for them! |
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 09 Posts: 300 Credit: 303,583,740 RAC: 668 |
This is the information needed to see the problem: <core_client_version>7.2.39</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The handle is invalid. (0x6) - exit code 6 (0x6) </message> <stderr_txt> <search_application> milkyway_nbody 1.40 Windows x86_64 double OpenMP, Crlibm </search_application> Using OpenMP 1 max threads on a system with 4 processors Failed to move file 'nbody_checkpoint_tmp_5532' to 'nbody_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'nbody_checkpoint_tmp_5532' to 'nbody_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'nbody_checkpoint_tmp_5532' to 'nbody_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'nbody_checkpoint_tmp_5532' to 'nbody_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'nbody_checkpoint_tmp_5532' to 'nbody_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'nbody_checkpoint_tmp_5532' to 'nbody_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'nbody_checkpoint_tmp_5532' to 'nbody_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to update checkpoint 'nbody_checkpoint' with temporary (2): No such file or directory Failed to write checkpoint Error running system: NBODY_CHECKPOINT_ERROR (64) 20:26:32 (5532): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> and <core_client_version>7.2.39</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> <search_application> milkyway_separation 1.00 Windows x86_64 double </search_application> Error loading Lua script 'astronomy_parameters.txt': [string "number_parameters: 4..."]:1: '<name>' expected near '4' Error reading astronomy parameters from file 'astronomy_parameters.txt' Trying old parameters file Using SSE4.1 path Failed to move file 'separation_checkpoint_tmp' to 'separation_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'separation_checkpoint_tmp' to 'separation_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'separation_checkpoint_tmp' to 'separation_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'separation_checkpoint_tmp' to 'separation_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'separation_checkpoint_tmp' to 'separation_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'separation_checkpoint_tmp' to 'separation_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to move file 'separation_checkpoint_tmp' to 'separation_checkpoint' (6832): This object is not allowed to be opened in a transaction. Failed to update checkpoint file ('separation_checkpoint_tmp' to 'separation_checkpoint') (2): No such file or directory Write checkpoint failed 17:26:02 (1556): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> anybody? |
Send message Joined: 22 Jan 11 Posts: 375 Credit: 64,707,164 RAC: 10 |
Not something to do with needing admin rights is it? Btw this is clearly a different problem to the theme & title of this thread (errors with MW v1.02 WUs only), should of started a new 1 really Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7 |
Send message Joined: 22 Jan 11 Posts: 375 Credit: 64,707,164 RAC: 10 |
Partial answer to my own question lol, I noticed when the MW v1.02 WUs are running, power draw at the wall goes up a lot on my HD 5850. Just now total power draw went from ~267w running MW sep. mod. fit to ~291w running MW v1.02! (think I'll start a new thread about that). Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7 |
Send message Joined: 8 May 09 Posts: 3339 Credit: 524,010,781 RAC: 0 |
Not something to do with needing admin rights is it? It sounds like it, which would lead back to the Service install the person did. |
Send message Joined: 3 Apr 10 Posts: 8 Credit: 27,124,250 RAC: 0 |
Yeah I noticed that to.I hope they lay off the aggression a bit. There is no need for the gpu to be running at 99% for a WU. Just my humble opinion. |
Send message Joined: 22 Jan 11 Posts: 375 Credit: 64,707,164 RAC: 10 |
The other WUs also run the GPU at ~99% too but still manage to draw less power, I guess they use less of the GPU. Btw the GPU load is supposed to be ~99% to make the best use of our GPUs ;). Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7 |
Send message Joined: 22 Jan 11 Posts: 375 Credit: 64,707,164 RAC: 10 |
It seems there is a fix to get (at least) Cat 13.9 drivers to work with MW v1.02 afterall! :) (some grammar edited ;) ) ***** Now running on Radeon hd 4870 opencl boinc ***** From this thread http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3500&postid=61344 Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7 |
Send message Joined: 13 Jun 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 372,474 RAC: 0 |
I'm using Catalyst 13.12 (clean install) and still getting the same issue. I posted a topic on the AMD Drivers forum... maybe that will help get some traction on this issue :( http://forums.amd.com/game/messageview.cfm?catid=454&threadid=172625&enterthread=y |
Send message Joined: 8 May 09 Posts: 3339 Credit: 524,010,781 RAC: 0 |
I'm using Catalyst 13.12 (clean install) and still getting the same issue. Have you tried the 13.9 set of drivers? If not why not, as it is reported that they do in fact work. |
Send message Joined: 22 Jan 11 Posts: 375 Credit: 64,707,164 RAC: 10 |
I'm using Catalyst 13.12 (clean install) and still getting the same issue. Linkified :P Doesn't hurt to try, although I can't help thinking it's a MW issue. Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7 |
Send message Joined: 22 Jan 11 Posts: 375 Credit: 64,707,164 RAC: 10 |
TTT This thread should be stickified. Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7 |
Send message Joined: 22 Jan 11 Posts: 375 Credit: 64,707,164 RAC: 10 |
Anyone know if this MW problem is fixed with more recent drivers? Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7 |
Send message Joined: 14 Dec 07 Posts: 9 Credit: 10,495,671 RAC: 1,932 |
No!...still problems HD5850 + cat driver 14.5 |
Send message Joined: 22 Jan 11 Posts: 375 Credit: 64,707,164 RAC: 10 |
FGS! Thx for the info anyway :) Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7 |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group