Sure the PSU is upto it?

Btw I asked you this a few days ago :-

Btw I just had a quick scan of your valid 213.76 cred WUs & some were down to the low 500s.
Was the time you gave with the GPU at nr. 100% load?

Mikey
So any spare C2Qs or 5850s? ;)

Also, you never did confirm if the results you gave for your grx cards were at stock MHz, are they?

Sorry work gets in the way of my fun....

PSU is fine, but the Motherboard isn't.... only a GTX 480 will work ( bulletproof build quality and it's hot anyway ! And very noisy ! )

The GPU is around 75% utilisation, CPU is down at stock clocks for stability ( used to be at 4GHz 24/7 ) variation will be due to SkynetPOGS or MW CPU WU's (IMHO).

dunx

P.S. It's more likely that the first few Wu's were run at stock clocks, but as I'm an OC addict.... ( Sorry ! )

No probs on it being o/ced :), just for the average 5 they need to be run at the same clock speed, otherwise the result is meaningless.

Only 75% GPU util.? Did MW not have a dedicated CPU core for the 5 averaged WUs?

---

Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG

Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7

Mikey
So any spare C2Qs or 5850s? ;) {/quote]

I have not looked yet for the cpu's and I do have some older gpu's but no 5850's. The extra ones I have are a couple of 5770's, but they run hot as they have been run hard and hung up wet.

[quote]Also, you never did confirm if the results you gave for your grx cards were at stock MHz, are they?

Yes all my stuff runs at stock speeds only.

Ok, so what spare CPUs & GPUs do you have?

---

Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG

Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7

No probs on it being o/ced :), just for the average 5 they need to be run at the same clock speed, otherwise the result is meaningless.

Only 75% GPU util.? Did MW not have a dedicated CPU core for the 5 averaged WUs?

Yup ! Always feed my babies properly.... unless the GPU really isn't using over half a "core"....

HD 7950 @ 950 GHz - around 120 seconds....

dunx

P.S. If the stupid R9 didn't have sticky-outy heat-pipes it would fit in the damned PC ! ! !

AMD7970 (GPU: 1Ghz, VRAM: 1.4Ghz), factory OC'ed video card
Catalyst ver: 14.1
CPU: Intel i7-2700K @ 4.3Ghz, slight over volt, 24/7 stable for last few years
Mobo chipset: z68
BOINC ver: 7.2.39 x64
OS: Win7 x64

Run time for avg. of 5 WU with a 213.76 credit: 77.762

I've been using the 14.1 Catalyst drivers for over a week and while perfectly stable they seem to have increased my run time a bit. Maybe 3-5 seconds. In game performance is a smidge better though.

Ok, so what spare CPUs & GPUs do you have?

Oh good grief MORE then one or two!! I have a basement FULL of pc stuff!! I even have some OLD 20 MEGABYTE hard drives laying around!! It will take me awhile to inventory everything, don't hold your breath or anything like that!

Hmm, new OCL driver in Beta 14.1 is really faster. Now my result is 87 seconds on 213.76 WU.

Nice! I'll add that, thx :)

Mikey
Lol, ok no probs, I'm only interested in C2Qs or 5850/70s, but I don't suppose you'd keep them or keep them idle ;)

New table

So feel free to share your new scores for old & new GPUs & CPUs alike! :)
I will update the table as necessary.

Requirements for benchmark, validated 213.76 credit WUs only, average of 5 WU times, dedicated CPU core for the GPU, please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory o/cs) or state 'stock'. It would also be handy if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any odds.

Oh & for the benchmark please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU otherwise it will massively increase WU time, naturally! ;) (even if it does increase output), and the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WU so you can't 1/2 the time either.

Current GPU statistics ~ Average Time to Complete 1 213.76 credit WU :-

HD 7970 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM u/c 850 MHz) ..... 69s Sunny129
HD 7950 (GPU 1100 MHz) ................................ 81s Mumak,
HD 7970 (stock) ............................................. 83s mikey
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 6 GHz,Cat 14.1b) 87s Leonheart
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 6 GHz) .............. 95s Leonheart
HD 7870 XT (stock) ...................................... 120s Matt
HD 7950 (GPU 850 MHz) ............................... 121s salvordorhardin
HD 6950 (stock) ........................................... 176s Icecold
HD 5870 (stock) ........................................... 192s mikey
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz) ............................... 210s Assim1
HD 5850 (GPU 775 MHz) ............................... 231s Assim1
HD 5850 (GPU 750 MHz) ............................... 245s salvordorhardin
HD 5850 1GB (stock) .................................... 246s Assim1 (this post)
GTX 780 Ti (stock) ........................................ 403s ... Linux - 395s biodoc
GTX 560 Ti 448c (GPU 880 MHz) .................... 471s GleeM
HD 4870 1GB (stock) .................................... 503s Assim1
GTX 570 (stock) ........................................... 520s - Linux biodoc
GTX 480 (GPU 750 MHz) ............................... 520s Dunx
HD 4850 1 GB (stock) ................................... 553s wayliff
HD 4830 512 MB (GPU 670 MHz) .................... 615s Assim1 (this post)
HD 7770 GHz ed. (GPU 1100 MHz) .................. 724s Mumak
HD 7770 GHz ed. (stock) ............................... 807s Deerslayer
GTX 660 Ti (GPU 1046 MHz) .......................... 816s - Linux biodoc
GTX 560 Ti (stock) ....................................... 836s Deerslayer
GTX 460 (GPU 750 MHz) 768 MB .................. 1127s Ken g6

Current CPU statistics ~ Average Time to Complete 1 213.76 credit WU :-

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

OS Windows, unless otherwise stated.

---

Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG

Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7

Ah nightmare!, it seems MW@H have very recently released faster 213.76 credit WUs, these are crunched about 33% (+/-5% ish) faster!

I'm wondering if the latest benchmarks have been affected by these different WUs, could people who gave me a time from approx the 15th onwards please check to see if I have the 'long' 213.76 WU times in the table?

So when picking benchmark times make sure you chose the longer 213.76 credit WUs. Each 'speed' WU should only vary by a few seconds or so where their is nothing else working the GPU.

Requirements for benchmark, validated 213.76 credit WUs only, average of 5 WU times, dedicated CPU core for the GPU, please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory o/cs) or state 'stock'. It would also be handy if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any odds.
[update] It seems MW@H have now (19-20th ish) released new faster 213.76 credit WUs along with the previously 'standard' speed WUs, so going by the benchmarks gathered so far (17/2/14) you need to average 5 of the longer 213.76 credit WUs only.

Oh & for the benchmark please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU otherwise it will massively increase WU time, naturally! ;) (even if it does increase output), and the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WU so you can't 1/2 the time either.

Current GPU statistics ~ Average Time to Complete 1 213.76 credit WU :-


HD 7950 (GPU 1100 MHz) ..................................... 81s Mumak,
HD 7970 (stock) .................................................. 83s mikey
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 6 GHz,Cat 14.1 b) .... 87s Leonheart
HD 7970 (GPU 950 MHz) ...................................... 90s Sunny129
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 6 GHz) ................... 95s Leonheart
HD 7870 XT (stock) ........................................... 120s Matt
HD 7950 (GPU 850 MHz) .................................... 121s salvordorhardin
HD 6950 (stock) ................................................ 176s Icecold
HD 5870 (stock) ................................................ 192s mikey
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz) .................................... 210s Assim1
HD 5850 (GPU 775 MHz) .................................... 231s Assim1
HD 5850 (GPU 750 MHz) .................................... 245s salvordorhardin
HD 5850 1GB (stock) ......................................... 246s Assim1 (this post)
GTX 780 Ti (stock) ............................................. 403s ... Linux - 395s biodoc
GTX 560 Ti 448c (GPU 880 MHz) ......................... 471s GleeM
HD 4870 1GB (stock) ......................................... 503s Assim1
GTX 570 (stock) ................................................ 520s - Linux biodoc
GTX 480 (GPU 750 MHz) ..................................... 520s Dunx
HD 4850 1 GB (stock) ........................................ 553s wayliff
HD 4830 512 MB (GPU 670 MHz) ......................... 615s Assim1 (this post)
HD 7770 GHz ed. (GPU 1100 MHz) ....................... 724s Mumak
HD 7770 GHz ed. (stock) .................................... 807s Deerslayer
GTX 660 Ti (GPU 1046 MHz) ............................... 816s - Linux biodoc
GTX 560 Ti (stock) ............................................ 836s Deerslayer
GTX 460 (GPU 750 MHz) 768 MB ....................... 1127s Ken g6

Current CPU statistics ~ Average Time to Complete 1 213.76 credit WU :-

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

OS Windows, unless otherwise stated.

---

Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG

Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7

Yeah, noticed new 213.76 WUs too. Also, OC GPU core to 1.1Ghz and DC memory to stock 5Ghz, now 80 seconds for old WUs and 52 seconds for new ones.

Nice improvement :), I'll add the long 213.76 time, lol you just piped Mumak to the top of the table ;).

Btw 1 of the guys on my team (Sunny129) underclocks his RAM on his 7970 & it makes no real difference to WU times!


Requirements for benchmark, validated 213.76 credit WUs only, average of 5 WU times, dedicated CPU core for the GPU, please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory o/cs) or state 'stock'. It would also be handy if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any odds.
[update] It seems MW@H have now (19-20th ish) released new faster 213.76 credit WUs along with the previously 'standard' speed WUs, so going by the benchmarks gathered so far (17/2/14) you need to average 5 of the longer 213.76 credit WUs only. Each 'speed' WU should only vary by a few seconds or so where their is nothing else working the GPU.

Oh & for the benchmark please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU otherwise it will massively increase WU time, naturally! ;) (even if it does increase output), and the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WU so you can't 1/2 the time either.

Current GPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 'long' 213.76 credit WU :-

HD 7950 (GPU 1100 MHz) ..................................... 80s Leonheart
HD 7950 (GPU 1100 MHz) ..................................... 81s Mumak,
HD 7970 (stock) .................................................. 83s mikey
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 6 GHz,Cat 14.1 b) .... 87s Leonheart
HD 7970 (GPU 950 MHz) ...................................... 90s Sunny129
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 6 GHz) ................... 95s Leonheart
HD 7870 XT (stock) ........................................... 120s Matt
HD 7950 (GPU 850 MHz) .................................... 121s salvordorhardin
HD 6950 (stock) ................................................ 176s Icecold
HD 5870 (stock) ................................................ 192s mikey
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz) .................................... 210s Assim1
HD 5850 (GPU 775 MHz) .................................... 231s Assim1
HD 5850 (GPU 750 MHz) .................................... 245s salvordorhardin
HD 5850 1GB (stock) ......................................... 246s Assim1 (1st post)
GTX 780 Ti (stock) ............................................. 403s ... Linux - 395s biodoc
GTX 560 Ti 448c (GPU 880 MHz) ......................... 471s GleeM
HD 4870 1GB (stock) ......................................... 503s Assim1
GTX 570 (stock) ................................................ 520s - Linux biodoc
GTX 480 (GPU 750 MHz) ..................................... 520s Dunx
HD 4850 1 GB (stock) ........................................ 553s wayliff
HD 4830 512 MB (GPU 670 MHz) ......................... 615s Assim1 (1st post)
HD 7770 GHz ed. (GPU 1100 MHz) ....................... 724s Mumak
HD 7770 GHz ed. (stock) .................................... 807s Deerslayer
GTX 660 Ti (GPU 1046 MHz) ............................... 816s - Linux biodoc
GTX 560 Ti (stock) ............................................ 836s Deerslayer
GTX 460 (GPU 750 MHz) 768 MB ....................... 1127s Ken g6

Current CPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 'long' 213.76 credit WU :-

Intel Core i7-3612QM ............................ 13,068 mikey http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3465&postid=60970
Intel Core 2 Q8300 ............................... 14,949s mikey http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3465&postid=60970
AMD FX 6100 ....................................... 18,275s mikey http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=3465&postid=60970


OS Windows, unless otherwise stated.

---

Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG

Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7

I'll install a new R9 280X (HD7970) on Monday, so will have more times ;)

Lol, cool :), would be good to have an 'R' card there, even if it is a rebranded 7970 ;).

mikey
As you can see I've averaged 3 of your CPU times (& will do a 4th in a moment, ran out of edit time), but if you want the rest of the times on the table then you'll need to do it, you were supposed to anyway :P.

---

Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG

Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7

Updated table with CPU times added.

Requirements for benchmark, validated 213.76 credit WUs only, average of 5 WU times, dedicated CPU core for the GPU, please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory o/cs) or state 'stock'. It would also be handy if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any odds.
[update] It seems MW@H have now (19-20th ish) released new faster 213.76 credit WUs along with the previously 'standard' speed WUs, so going by the benchmarks gathered so far (17/2/14) you need to average 5 of the longer 213.76 credit WUs only. Each 'speed' WU should only vary by a few seconds or so where their is nothing else working the GPU.

Oh & for the benchmark please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU otherwise it will massively increase WU time, naturally! ;) (even if it does increase output), and the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WU so you can't 1/2 the time either.

Current GPU statistics ~ Average Time to Complete 1 'long' 213.76 credit WU :-

HD 7950 (GPU 1100 MHz) ..................................... 80s Leonheart
HD 7950 (GPU 1100 MHz) ..................................... 81s Mumak,
HD 7970 (stock) .................................................. 83s mikey
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 6 GHz,Cat 14.1 b) .... 87s Leonheart
HD 7970 (GPU 950 MHz) ...................................... 90s Sunny129
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 6 GHz) ................... 95s Leonheart
HD 7870 XT (stock) ........................................... 120s Matt
HD 7950 (GPU 850 MHz) .................................... 121s salvordorhardin
HD 6950 (stock) ................................................ 176s Icecold
HD 5870 (stock) ................................................ 192s mikey
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz) .................................... 210s Assim1
HD 5850 (GPU 775 MHz) .................................... 231s Assim1
HD 5850 (GPU 750 MHz) .................................... 245s salvordorhardin
HD 5850 1GB (stock) ......................................... 246s Assim1 (this post)
GTX 780 Ti (stock) ............................................. 403s ... Linux - 395s biodoc
GTX 560 Ti 448c (GPU 880 MHz) ......................... 471s GleeM
HD 4870 1GB (stock) ......................................... 503s Assim1
GTX 570 (stock) ................................................ 520s - Linux biodoc
GTX 480 (GPU 750 MHz) ..................................... 520s Dunx
HD 4850 1 GB (stock) ........................................ 553s wayliff
HD 4830 512 MB (GPU 670 MHz) ......................... 615s Assim1 (this post)
HD 7770 GHz ed. (GPU 1100 MHz) ....................... 724s Mumak
HD 7770 GHz ed. (stock) .................................... 807s Deerslayer
GTX 660 Ti (GPU 1046 MHz) ............................... 816s - Linux biodoc
GTX 560 Ti (stock) ............................................ 836s Deerslayer
GTX 460 (GPU 750 MHz) 768 MB ....................... 1127s Ken g6

Current CPU statistics ~ Average Time to Complete 1 'long' 213.76 credit WU :-

Intel Core i7-3612QM ............................ 13,068s mikey
Intel Core 2 Q8300 ............................... 14,949s mikey
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T ...................... 14,950s mikey
AMD FX 6300 ....................................... 15,521s mikey
AMD FX 6100 ....................................... 17,449s mikey
Intel Core 2 Q8200 ............................... 19,542s mikey
AMD Phenom 9850 ............................... 25,844s mikey

OS Windows, unless otherwise stated.

****************************************************************

Tempted to see what my CPU will do them in ;).
Temporarily switched my CPU to MW from Asteroids@H & instantly a 4C drop in temps, lol.

Mikey
Ok I did a few more ;), but for the last 1 it's down to you to do.

---

Team AnandTech - SETI@H, DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP, WCG

Main rig - Ryzen 5 3600, MSI B450 G.Pro C. AC, RTX 3060Ti 8GB, 32GB DDR4 3200, Win 10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 16GB DDR3 1866, Win7

Yea, i was tried hard ) Memory OC isn`t important for crunching, and pretty unstable on high clocks. Really nice to see that 7950 can be faster than stock 7970 lol. But OC 280X will beat all variants.

Will see the next week with a new Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD REV 2.0 ;-) Boost 1100 MHz. Also what temperatures will the WINDFORCE 3X cooling maintain under sustained DP load...

Will also get a new Dual Xeon workstation soon. I was hoping it will be fitted with a Tesla (full DP), but it wasn't possible :-(

Hmm, CPU isn`t very interesting thing in most projects - too slow, Xeon or not. Have interest in Tesla/FirePro testing for crunching, but too expensive to even try.
I think WindForce will provide enough cooling level, something about 75-80c maybe. On my DirectCUII 68-70c now.

I'll utilize the CPUs for WCG and T4T.

75-80 C? I hope not so high !
My 7950's with STOCK settings were reaching power limit and overheating on MW. Then I noticed the default max VDDC was set to 1.25V, which is way too high. So I reduced it. Now at full DP load the VDDC is ~1.07V and temps are ~65 C.

mikey
As you can see I've averaged 3 of your CPU times (& will do a 4th in a moment, ran out of edit time), but if you want the rest of the times on the table then you'll need to do it, you were supposed to anyway :P.

Okay, I am just pushed for time right now, it is just one thing after another, being retired is tiring!!