Message boards :
News :
Updated Server Daemons and Libraries
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 14 Posts: 3 Credit: 29,423,195 RAC: 4,342 |
Thanks for getting back to me. It seems like I will have to update my graphics card. |
Send message Joined: 2 Oct 14 Posts: 43 Credit: 55,061,415 RAC: 1,562 |
My preferences exclude GPU work. My machines use Intel 6-gen processors with GPU on die. However, I am still getting computation errors on 8-thread tasks, but a lot less than before now. Other crunchers that run these tasks also abort with computation errors, so the issue is repeatable with up to three additional and different users. I am getting no computation errors from another BOINC project unrelated to milkyway. This leads me to believe that the cause is data driven, not a code error, and in need of defensive programming to avoid the problem. If one or more subroutines (or threads) are sequentially bound, and the prerequisite thread does not complete before another thread needs to use its results, the consequences are predictable (all bad). The most common computational error is a zero-divide error. If the prerequisite thread is supposed to return an address location, it could produce a computation error if it references a location that is either protected or out of bounds. I have not coded anything in years, but remember the pain. Hope this helps you to look in the right places. |
Send message Joined: 25 Feb 13 Posts: 580 Credit: 94,200,158 RAC: 0 |
Wisesooth, The erroring work units you see are from the N-body application and not Separation. N-body is still very much a beta application and will likely not work all of the time. Sidd knows about the particular problem you are seeing which is a disk usage error (we are going over the commonly allotted 50MB of disk space we are allowed to use). Hopefully Sidd will figure out why and how to fix it soon. Jake |
Send message Joined: 6 Apr 12 Posts: 42 Credit: 3,215,609 RAC: 0 |
i have an ATI 4800 ... actually 2 of them. I downgraded from the windows 10 version driver back to a 2012 driver that it has open cl support. Before I downgraded the driver version, I was receiving error messages about missing co processor support. Now all I get is 0 work fetched. Its disappointing I cannot use these cards that they have a lot of grunt. |
Send message Joined: 14 Feb 09 Posts: 19 Credit: 62,373,513 RAC: 0 |
I also have AMD cards (39xx/38xx) cards on W10, but still running the drivers I've been using all along. No weird errors, but definitely seeing the no new tasks available. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jun 13 Posts: 15 Credit: 2,070,897,222 RAC: 0 |
I'm not getting any work units either, on the Mac version. Here is a log of one attempt: Wed Sep 28 20:17:27 2016 | Milkyway@Home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Wed Sep 28 20:17:27 2016 | Milkyway@Home | Requesting new tasks for AMD/ATI GPU Wed Sep 28 20:17:29 2016 | Milkyway@Home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks Wed Sep 28 20:17:29 2016 | Milkyway@Home | No tasks sent Wed Sep 28 20:17:29 2016 | Milkyway@Home | No tasks are available for Milkyway@Home Separation (Modified Fit) Wed Sep 28 20:17:29 2016 | Milkyway@Home | Message from server: Your app_info.xml file doesn't have a usable version of MilkyWay@Home N-Body Simulation. Wed Sep 28 20:17:29 2016 | Milkyway@Home | Tasks for CPU are available, but your preferences are set to not accept them Wed Sep 28 20:17:29 2016 | Milkyway@Home | Tasks for NVIDIA GPU are available, but your preferences are set to not accept them That error from N-Body is from my custom app_info.xml; I'm simply too lazy to fix it. ;) Otherwise I'm using the regular 1.37 binary for Mac ATI opencl. I figured maybe this was the cause, so I temporarily renamed the app_info.xml and started up without it, but this had no effect (other than removing my self-inflicted n-body error, of course). |
Send message Joined: 2 Oct 14 Posts: 43 Credit: 55,061,415 RAC: 1,562 |
I Increased preferences about HD use from 40 to 80 and updated BOINC manager before I returned here to post this message. BOINC Mgr reports: Used by BOINC 15.91 MB Used by milkyway 9.9 MB Used by other programs 27.74 GB Free but not available to BOINC is 823.22 GB This machine has 16 GB RAM and has a 1 TB Seagate hard drive. Uses Win 10 64-bit OS with Intel i7 processor. The only BOINC task running on this machine is milkyway at home. My profile currently shows over 50 tasks with computational errors. Other users are reporting the same errors on these tasks. My other machines are running single CPU tasks with no errors on non-milkyway projects. Hope this helps you. BTW, have you considered the possibility that BOINC, not milkyway, is causing this problem? After all, the only project I know about on BOINC using all available threads on a single task is milkyway. |
Send message Joined: 30 Apr 14 Posts: 67 Credit: 160,674,488 RAC: 0 |
My PC (Radeon 280X) also isn't getting workunits. Most often it's getting 0 tasks when requesting new tasks. Problem still persists. I can even say it's worse. 2k credits for 2016-09-29. So like 340k too low... |
Send message Joined: 25 Feb 13 Posts: 580 Credit: 94,200,158 RAC: 0 |
Arivald and others, I am going to keep tweaking things on my end to try to increase work unit availability. Might take a few more days to get the settings right. Thank you for your patience. Jake |
Send message Joined: 22 Mar 09 Posts: 6 Credit: 779,762,595 RAC: 2,876 |
Much appreciated. No new work since the 25th and even then I had perhaps a dozen tasks over the course of a week compared to ~ 140k RAC previously. |
Send message Joined: 13 Jun 09 Posts: 3 Credit: 365,525 RAC: 0 |
Hello, I am getting new jobs, but they're all ending in 'Computation Error' after 2-4 seconds. Wasn't having this issue prior, all other projects run fine. No system or hardware changes have been made on my end. https://s15.postimg.org/mptam7ru3/Screenshot_2016_09_30_10_10_06.png |
Send message Joined: 22 Jun 13 Posts: 44 Credit: 64,258,609 RAC: 0 |
Will Guerin, The error message in your task log says that your GPU's do not support double precision which is required for Milkyway processing. |
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 09 Posts: 70 Credit: 11,027,167,827 RAC: 0 |
captainjack is right, your GPUs don't have double precision, which is needed for Milkyway@home Will Guerin. My 390X seems to work now, but only when running without app_config file. It is running one WU at a time for now. After a quick sear on the web, it looks like the latest Microsoft Windows 10 Update really messed up the GPU drivers. Milkyway causes errors since the Update, and even Einstein@home (2 WUs at once). But for some reason my 280X cards seem unaffected. Can anyone confirm this? I guess GPUs like 280X and below still work well, while 290X and above cause problems. Windows 10, latest update, and using an app_config to run multiple WUs at once. These circumstances have to apply to cause WUs hanging when one WU has finished at 100% and stays there. |
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 09 Posts: 70 Credit: 11,027,167,827 RAC: 0 |
After updating my HD5970 computer to Windows 10 1607 (Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems (KB3194496)), i get some strange behaviors there too. I run 4 WUs on one GPU core. So 8 WUs at once on the dual GPU card After nearly a minute of heavy CPU-Work (3 Cores almost running at 100% of 6 Cores) the GPU gets into action. It was running well before the update to 1607. Does anyone have information about what Microsoft changed to the drivers? The update also affects the R9 390X, and i guess other GPUs as well. Please post anyone, if he has trouble with it too. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jun 13 Posts: 15 Credit: 2,070,897,222 RAC: 0 |
To follow up on my previous post...I have fixed my problem, sort of. It turns out that my project prefs had everything disabled except for Separation (Modified Fit). I honestly don't remember why I did that...so, I turned the basic app back on (leaving n-body off), and I began to receive some work units. At first, it seemed like I could only make that happen without my custom app_info.xml (which means Jake got it to read newer GPUs after all! :) ) but after that I put the app_info.xml back, and it's still working. Which is good, because that way I can crunch 3 WUs at a time :) In spite of this, new WUs are still sporatic. Some updates don't give me anything, and then a minute later, I'll get a few. I'm not getting anything from Separation still. |
Send message Joined: 8 Jan 10 Posts: 21 Credit: 33,211,690 RAC: 0 |
I'm getting Computation Error on every milkyway@home task I run. The Tasks page of BOINC manager says "Computation error (0.0176 CPUs +1 AMD/ATI GPU)". There's no corresponding text in the Event Log page, nor in any file under ~/boinc. This is a Gentoo Linux 12-core i7 box with plenty of RAM and disk space, so this isn't the Windows problem reported above. 0.0176 is about 1/58. I'm running the latest versions available of all drivers etc. The error comes up immediately each task is started. I've reset the project but that made no difference. The job log has a date stamp of 24 Sept, and its last entry is "1474692508 ue 5545.518061 ct 1614.182000 fe 1307020000000 nm de_nbody_8_22_16_v162_2k_2_1474377580_43838_0 et 172.516924 es 0". Other projects' job logs are date-stamped today. # lspci -n -s 01:00.0 01:00.0 0300: 1002:6938 (rev f1) Rgds Peter. |
Send message Joined: 8 Jan 10 Posts: 21 Credit: 33,211,690 RAC: 0 |
# lspci -n -s 01:00.0 01:00.0 0300: 1002:6938 (rev f1) You can find the details of this device at https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/read/PC/1002/6938 . I'm peterh in that discussion. Rgds Peter. |
Send message Joined: 25 Feb 13 Posts: 580 Credit: 94,200,158 RAC: 0 |
Hey Everyone, I did some work tuning the database yesterday to improve insert query times for the workunit generator after determining that query was the bottle neck in work unit generation. Seems to have vastly improve the work unit availability. If you guys are still running out of work units please let me know. Jake |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 309,729,457 RAC: 0 |
Thanks Jake, Looks like its back to normal at my end. Really appreciate your hard work. |
Send message Joined: 25 Feb 13 Posts: 580 Credit: 94,200,158 RAC: 0 |
Thank you Tom and everyone else who crunches for us. We really appreciate your work crunching our work units. Jake |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group