Message boards :
Number crunching :
Long running wu.
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 25 May 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 56,750,059 RAC: 0 |
I saw this wu... http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=1559573628 on my system. Normally, the jobs here run to completion in 5-6 minutes, but this one was 56% complete, not increasing, and had over a day of crunching time logged. I suspended and released it, the percentage done dropped and it started again running to completion quickly. You can see by the sent/returned dates that something weird happened. I've not noticed this before here, but it has certainly worried me, as I have the project on here, a system I do not look at much, it is simply a number cruncher. Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream... |
Send message Joined: 8 Mar 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 32,493,809 RAC: 25 |
I have this problem too. Stopping and restarting Boinc client clears the time to 5-6 minutes again. |
Send message Joined: 8 Jan 18 Posts: 44 Credit: 43,856,749 RAC: 3,017 |
First, the link posted does not seem to work? I had a similar problem for Seti WUs that used Intel GPUs. Work would start, but ETA would never end. If you paused crunching on the WU, it would just restart. I discovered that thrashing was an overall problem with iGPUs, so I just stopped using the processor on BOINC. This problem sprouted all of a sudden one day; I don't think I had any changes on my system so I suspect it was something with the WU itself. Sorry, I know that doesn't help. |
Send message Joined: 25 May 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 56,750,059 RAC: 0 |
>>> First, the link posted does not seem to work? It does not work anymore, it did when I posted it. |
Send message Joined: 27 Jan 15 Posts: 10 Credit: 1,512,630 RAC: 0 |
Because the database clears results from the BOINC server after so many days else you'd start to get huge performance degradation. Typically, the more active a project, the shorter the period. The alternative is investing in really expensive corporate enterprise servers... |
Send message Joined: 27 Jan 15 Posts: 10 Credit: 1,512,630 RAC: 0 |
I saw this wu... Seen that a number of times. I think it's an ongoing bug they are battling. If you don't want to babysit, turn N-body off. Pretty annoying to come home and realize your computer been spinning its wheels on a WU since last night... |
Send message Joined: 25 Mar 18 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,636,029 RAC: 0 |
A bit of a kick to this topic, but apparently I am running into the same issue with N-body tasks. Once my display turn off (power saving option) the task basically stops running, timer moves on, task calculations don't. After returning, it shows the following: https://tweakers.net/ext/f/ulINereZ3BO5WoqV9aqqHxlB/full.png After restarting BOINC, this: https://tweakers.net/ext/f/iqFyPTv2veSk6YY07Rwg5hxS/full.png For now it only happened with N-body tasks during my project testing period. If this doesn't occur the WU also finishes within 10 minutes, unlike the 20ish it needed for that after it occurred. |
Send message Joined: 25 Mar 18 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,636,029 RAC: 0 |
Been trying a lot, drivers updated, latest version of BOINC, no other programs running, keeping the machine active. But doesn't matter if I keep the machine active or not, eventually the {mt} task will stop running. As it is now I will just remove {mt} WU's and turn them off. Shame I have to, but they keep suspending progression. |
Send message Joined: 8 May 09 Posts: 3339 Credit: 524,010,781 RAC: 0 |
Been trying a lot, drivers updated, latest version of BOINC, no other programs running, keeping the machine active. Alot of us are in the same boat, they just won't work like they should all the time so we've moved on. As long as it does work for enough people they will keep sending them out. |
Send message Joined: 9 Jul 17 Posts: 100 Credit: 16,967,906 RAC: 0 |
I haven't seen a long running work unit yet, but I am on Ubuntu 16.04 (i7-4770). It might be a Windows problem? https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/results.php?hostid=763264 |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group