Welcome to MilkyWay@home

Validation

Message boards : Number crunching : Validation
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Rogfou
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 21
Posts: 3
Credit: 2,971,458
RAC: 0
Message 71119 - Posted: 18 Sep 2021, 12:24:22 UTC
Last modified: 18 Sep 2021, 12:27:43 UTC

What that mean validation no inclusive?
ID: 71119 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 May 09
Posts: 3339
Credit: 524,010,781
RAC: 0
Message 71121 - Posted: 19 Sep 2021, 10:28:46 UTC - in response to Message 71119.  

What that mean validation no inclusive?


It means waiting on your wingman to get credit for the task
ID: 71121 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Rogfou
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 21
Posts: 3
Credit: 2,971,458
RAC: 0
Message 71122 - Posted: 19 Sep 2021, 12:44:55 UTC - in response to Message 71121.  

I means inconclusive results. Excuse me for my bad english.
ID: 71122 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 May 09
Posts: 3339
Credit: 524,010,781
RAC: 0
Message 71124 - Posted: 20 Sep 2021, 10:05:54 UTC - in response to Message 71122.  

I means inconclusive results. Excuse me for my bad english.


No problem you speak better English than I do French!!

There are two kinds of results for tasks here that essentially mean the same thing:
Validation pending (4) · Validation inconclusive (10)

They both mean waiting for your wingman, which is just someone else running the exact same task and hopefully coming up with the same result. IF that wingman's numbers are not close enough to your result than it will be sent to a 3rd, 4th etc computer until they get one close enough to the expected result. Boinc has a way for the Projects to do something to the tasks before we get them to give an expected result, not the actual result but something in the range, when a computer sends back a task that is out of that range of expected result than it can be considered faulty and the result is thrown out and the task will be considered invalid.
ID: 71124 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Rogfou
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 21
Posts: 3
Credit: 2,971,458
RAC: 0
Message 71125 - Posted: 20 Sep 2021, 11:57:11 UTC - in response to Message 71124.  

Thank you for the answer.
Have a good day.
ID: 71125 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Septimus

Send message
Joined: 8 Nov 11
Posts: 205
Credit: 2,900,464
RAC: 0
Message 71126 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 6:45:25 UTC

Has the time increased in waiting for results I have tasks that have been waiting for 12 days so far to be validated/failed, two of them total 147,000 seconds.
ID: 71126 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
mrchips
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Oct 10
Posts: 15
Credit: 281,009,768
RAC: 5
Message 71127 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 10:40:12 UTC

stream_fit_validator (milkyway) has been down for over 1 day.

no WU being processed, I have over 1,800 waiting for validation.
ID: 71127 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Septimus

Send message
Joined: 8 Nov 11
Posts: 205
Credit: 2,900,464
RAC: 0
Message 71128 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 10:45:47 UTC - in response to Message 71127.  
Last modified: 21 Sep 2021, 10:46:49 UTC

Thanks for that I have only recently returned to this project.
ID: 71128 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Septimus

Send message
Joined: 8 Nov 11
Posts: 205
Credit: 2,900,464
RAC: 0
Message 71129 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 14:10:27 UTC - in response to Message 71128.  

I can see that there are over 2 Million tasks awaiting for the validator something would seem to be wrong ?
ID: 71129 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile White Mountain Wes
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 09
Posts: 32
Credit: 18,138,776
RAC: 0
Message 71130 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 14:29:11 UTC

I agree that something is wrong; a validator is off-line, pending validations are piling up, and my RAC is plummeting. Is the MW staff looking into this?
ID: 71130 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom Donlon
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 19
Posts: 408
Credit: 120,203,200
RAC: 0
Message 71131 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 14:48:27 UTC

I restarted the validator and it looks like it's staying up for the moment. It's possible that there's a problem with my recent patch to the validator... I'll have to dig through some log files when I get back to the office (I am currently traveling).

Hopefully this didn't impact anyone too much. I'll make sure to bring this to Eric's attention so he can keep an eye on things while I'm not available.
ID: 71131 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile White Mountain Wes
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 09
Posts: 32
Credit: 18,138,776
RAC: 0
Message 71132 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 15:14:40 UTC - in response to Message 71131.  

Thank you for looking into this. My RAC is on the rise.
ID: 71132 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Septimus

Send message
Joined: 8 Nov 11
Posts: 205
Credit: 2,900,464
RAC: 0
Message 71133 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 15:43:24 UTC - in response to Message 71131.  

Looks like it has stopped again..
ID: 71133 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom Donlon
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 19
Posts: 408
Credit: 120,203,200
RAC: 0
Message 71134 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 16:02:24 UTC

Noticed that the validator went down again. I restarted the entire server this time instead of just the validator process. If it goes down again I will probably swap the old validator back in temporarily until I can fix things. That would mean that there will be a very high failure rate on the validations (like there were before the fix), but at least there will be a working validator in the meantime before I can get back to NY and look at things more carefully.
ID: 71134 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom Donlon
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 19
Posts: 408
Credit: 120,203,200
RAC: 0
Message 71136 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 16:05:32 UTC
Last modified: 21 Sep 2021, 16:57:15 UTC

Looks like it crashed again after failing to come up. I will swap the old validator back in and make a news post.

EDIT: The old validator crashed too, which makes sense based on the explanation given in the news post. I swapped the new validator back in.
ID: 71136 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom Donlon
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 19
Posts: 408
Credit: 120,203,200
RAC: 0
Message 71139 - Posted: 21 Sep 2021, 16:56:41 UTC

ID: 71139 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Streamer

Send message
Joined: 13 Aug 12
Posts: 1
Credit: 87,540,284
RAC: 0
Message 71146 - Posted: 23 Sep 2021, 10:07:00 UTC
Last modified: 23 Sep 2021, 10:08:11 UTC

Hi,
I have 199 completed inconclusive jobs open.
When I look at them with the status ( Completed, validation inconclusive), it is because a part of the job we are waiting for is Unsent .
(340938709 --- --- --- Unsent)
Is this part going to be sent?
Or what is the meaning of this status? computer time and no credits ???

Maybe someone can look in to this.
ID: 71146 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Validation

©2024 Astroinformatics Group