Message boards :
Number crunching :
An interesting error...
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 10 Dec 07 Posts: 36 Credit: 5,152,242 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
...which I've never seen before. 23/11/2008 17:03:40|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 11 completed tasks 23/11/2008 17:03:50|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 23/11/2008 17:04:16||[error] Proposed work request 295581.833482 bigger than max 218334.528000 23/11/2008 17:04:20||[error] Proposed work request 502649.499331 bigger than max 218334.528000 -ChinookFöhn |
![]() Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
...which I've never seen before. Say that looks like BOINC Studio. I remember those errors. :D me@rescam.org |
Send message Joined: 10 Dec 07 Posts: 36 Credit: 5,152,242 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Can't say I've ever heard of BOINC Studio 'til your reference to it. Googled it and it doesn't look that interesting. -ChinookFöhn |
![]() Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Can't say I've ever heard of BOINC Studio 'til your reference to it. Googled it and it doesn't look that interesting. That's a possible error when you set the client # of CPUs higher than what you really have. me@rescam.org |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Sep 07 Posts: 22 Credit: 320,035 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
It's a sanity check in the work fetch algorithm of the core client. It pops up occasionally, but is totally harmless. Kathryn :o) The BOINC FAQ Service The Unofficial BOINC Wiki The Trac System More BOINC information than you can shake a stick of RAM at. |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group