Message boards :
News :
Server Downtime March 28, 2022 (12 hours starting 00:00 UTC)
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 15 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
... sorry, forgot to take my sunglasses off !Sorry, I'm from Scotland. What is "sun"? |
Send message Joined: 3 Mar 13 Posts: 84 Credit: 779,527,712 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
... sorry, forgot to take my sunglasses off !Sorry, I'm from Scotland. What is "sun"? I think that will be `sun microsystems` they do computer stuff ;-) Today here in Cumbria its been snowing little snowballs and the mountain tops are with with it . |
Send message Joined: 20 Nov 07 Posts: 54 Credit: 2,663,789 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Assume 'validation inconclusive' backlog will be chipped away next? |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 712 Credit: 551,587,351 RAC: 55,034 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Assume 'validation inconclusive' backlog will be chipped away next? Yes, as soon as more results are returned by wingmen until consensus is achieved on the task. No guarantee that your inconclusive results will be reduced significantly though. The validators still produce a high amount of inconclusives depending on whether your results are matched against another result from the same type of architecture, OS and hardware. If your result is paired with another similar host, the better chance your result will not be proclaimed inconclusive. Pairing results from a Windows host against a Linux host or ARM host will produce a higher quantity of inconclusives. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
If your result is paired with another similar host, the better chance your result will not be proclaimed inconclusive. Pairing results from a Windows host against a Linux host or ARM host will produce a higher quantity of inconclusives.And here was me thinking computers were precise.... |
Send message Joined: 28 May 17 Posts: 76 Credit: 4,398,268,653 RAC: 965 ![]() ![]() |
Things are looking good! With any luck, we're on the other side of this issue.Can I sell you some more hamsters? SSDs isn't some magic hardware that'll solve the problem here. Not sure why you keep thinking HDDs aren't capable of doing what they've been doing for decades. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 712 Credit: 551,587,351 RAC: 55,034 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If your result is paired with another similar host, the better chance your result will not be proclaimed inconclusive. Pairing results from a Windows host against a Linux host or ARM host will produce a higher quantity of inconclusives.And here was me thinking computers were precise.... Only as precise as the math libraries and host architecture allows. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Because they're far too slow for the amount of data shifted today. They're too slow for a desktop let alone a server with 1000s of users. There's a reason SiDock, Universe, Rosetta, etc, etc, all use them. They all said they're brilliant. Why would you want to wait for a head to physically move from one track to another? It's an absurd amount of time to wait when 300 people want access simultaneously. Have you not seen how long the Milkyway server took to rebuild a disk while trying to cater for users? It was ridiculous.Things are looking good! With any luck, we're on the other side of this issue.Can I sell you some more hamsters? |
![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Here was me thinking computers gave the same answer every time. A 0 or a 1. Humans say "about 15", computers don't.If your result is paired with another similar host, the better chance your result will not be proclaimed inconclusive. Pairing results from a Windows host against a Linux host or ARM host will produce a higher quantity of inconclusives.And here was me thinking computers were precise.... |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 09 Posts: 89 Credit: 17,206,699 RAC: 2,478 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh, OK. The Dark unreadable picture if you look closely shows history and trends so it has lots of value Bill F In October of 1969 I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; There was no expiration date. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
The Dark unreadable picture if you look closely shows history and trends so it has lots of valueBill FNot sure why anyone would call that dark or unreadable. Candle powered monitors? |
Send message Joined: 20 Nov 07 Posts: 54 Credit: 2,663,789 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Assume 'validation inconclusive' backlog will be chipped away next? Here's my current status: State: All (739) · In progress (0) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (723) · Valid (5) · Invalid (0) · Error (11) Application: All (739) · Milkyway@home N-Body Simulation (659) · Milkyway@home Separation (80) I suspect a high number will be matched and validated. |
![]() Send message Joined: 21 Feb 22 Posts: 66 Credit: 817,008 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I haven't gotten any WUs for almost two hours. Just checking if it is just me. I've been getting a steady stream until now, so just curious. |
Send message Joined: 31 Mar 12 Posts: 96 Credit: 152,502,153 RAC: 1,028 ![]() ![]() |
I haven't gotten any WUs for almost two hours. Just checking if it is just me. I've been getting a steady stream until now, so just curious. I got 4 tasks about 15 minutes ago for the CPU, but that is all my client requested Just got some now(You'll need to convert Sydney time): 4/1/2022 10:55:15 AM | Milkyway@Home | [sched_op] Starting scheduler request 4/1/2022 10:55:15 AM | Milkyway@Home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 4/1/2022 10:55:15 AM | Milkyway@Home | Requesting new tasks for CPU 4/1/2022 10:55:15 AM | Milkyway@Home | [sched_op] CPU work request: 5872.97 seconds; 0.00 devices 4/1/2022 10:55:15 AM | Milkyway@Home | [sched_op] NVIDIA GPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices 4/1/2022 10:55:17 AM | Milkyway@Home | Scheduler request completed: got 13 new tasks 4/1/2022 10:55:17 AM | Milkyway@Home | [sched_op] Server version 713 4/1/2022 10:55:17 AM | Milkyway@Home | Project requested delay of 91 seconds |
Send message Joined: 28 May 17 Posts: 76 Credit: 4,398,268,653 RAC: 965 ![]() ![]() |
Because they're far too slow for the amount of data shifted today. They're too slow for a desktop let alone a server with 1000s of users. There's a reason SiDock, Universe, Rosetta, etc, etc, all use them. They all said they're brilliant. Why would you want to wait for a head to physically move from one track to another? It's an absurd amount of time to wait when 300 people want access simultaneously. Have you not seen how long the Milkyway server took to rebuild a disk while trying to cater for users? It was ridiculous. SSD wouldn't have made that much of a difference during the rebuilding process. Tom took the project offline and it finished in around 12 hours. Now the spinners are handing things just fine. There is more to validating tasks besides just moving data around and the HDD array isn't the bottleneck. |
Send message Joined: 31 Mar 12 Posts: 96 Credit: 152,502,153 RAC: 1,028 ![]() ![]() |
Oh, OK. Would you prefer searing white? ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 712 Credit: 551,587,351 RAC: 55,034 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I haven't gotten any WUs for almost two hours. Just checking if it is just me. I've been getting a steady stream until now, so just curious. It's not just you. I had Separation tasks for most of the day but they dried up about an hour ago. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 21 Feb 22 Posts: 66 Credit: 817,008 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I still haven't gotten any WUs. Thanks Keith for the confirmation. The status page hasn't updated in a while either. Sorry Tom, you might need to perform some more percussive maintenance. |
Send message Joined: 31 Mar 12 Posts: 96 Credit: 152,502,153 RAC: 1,028 ![]() ![]() |
I still haven't gotten any WUs. Thanks Keith for the confirmation. Really? I guess its easier to fulfil smaller work requests 4/1/2022 2:37:30 PM | Milkyway@Home | [sched_op] Starting scheduler request 4/1/2022 2:37:30 PM | Milkyway@Home | Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks. 4/1/2022 2:37:30 PM | Milkyway@Home | Reporting 1 completed tasks 4/1/2022 2:37:30 PM | Milkyway@Home | Requesting new tasks for CPU 4/1/2022 2:37:30 PM | Milkyway@Home | [sched_op] CPU work request: 75.25 seconds; 0.00 devices 4/1/2022 2:37:30 PM | Milkyway@Home | [sched_op] NVIDIA GPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices 4/1/2022 2:37:33 PM | Milkyway@Home | Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks 4/1/2022 2:37:33 PM | Milkyway@Home | [sched_op] Server version 713 4/1/2022 2:37:33 PM | Milkyway@Home | Project requested delay of 91 seconds |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 712 Credit: 551,587,351 RAC: 55,034 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am also seeing database corruption. I am now seeing timed out tasks that I never had received on any of my hosts during the server disk failure disruption. ![]() |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group