Message boards :
Number crunching :
Validation inconclusive
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 |
still unclear how they determine inconclusives if it's not being compared to anything lolI assume that's the small number of yours which are still being randomly tested? And that number drops as you get more trustworthy. |
Send message Joined: 18 Nov 22 Posts: 84 Credit: 640,530,847 RAC: 0 |
Oh, I thought you had a few of those. What are those ones you have watercooled about 4 in one PC you showed a picture of in Einstein? i don't run that system anymore, but it was 7x RTX 2080. that system has since been dismantled, parted out, and converted to something else. I don't have any multi-GPU setups that are water cooled like that anymore. my other multi-GPU systems are air cooled at the moment. Odd, I see it as 7.5Tflops DP, pretty much the same as all my old Tahitis together, and I get 1 maybe 1.5 million credits a day. theoretical specs vs real world outcome. just look at the leaderboard here and you'll see MANY TitanVs in the 2-2.5M range per GPU. and with tuning you can push it more. mine should come close to 3M if i run it long enough. |
Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 714 Credit: 554,763,249 RAC: 34,730 |
I believe they fit each result returned into a "not unreasonable result" filter. I believe that is defined by the: <stream_only_likelihood2> <search_likelihood2> values returned for each result in the stderr.txt output. If the values are reasonable, then they don't need an extra validation task, if unreasonable the result goes into inconclusive status and warrants a wingman task. |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 |
theoretical specs vs real world outcome. just look at the leaderboard here and you'll see MANY TitanVs in the 2-2.5M range per GPU. and with tuning you can push it more. mine should come close to 3M if i run it long enough.I guess those specs (I get from techpowerup) are raw specs, like looking at GHz of a CPU. Your Titan presumably has a better instruction set MW can take advantage of. I take it you're considerably richer than me :-/ https://youtu.be/qRKbX_ilsVI?t=4 |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 |
I believe they fit each result returned into a "not unreasonable result" filter. I believe that is defined by the:Sounds good, so when I stick a dodgy GPU into my good host, it'll get spotted for the charlatan it is pretty quickly. |
Send message Joined: 8 May 09 Posts: 3339 Credit: 524,010,781 RAC: 0 |
I believe they fit each result returned into a "not unreasonable result" filter. I believe that is defined by the: Yes it should and the whole host will will then be put on 'watch' again requiring wingmen until you get 10 valid tasks in a row |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 |
Yes it should and the whole host will will then be put on 'watch' again requiring wingmen until you get 10 valid tasks in a rowI buy broken cards and resurrect. You can get a busted one for a third of the price. Sometimes just a fan is broken, or the fan controller which you can bypass, or some heatsink gunk and pads (I use the super stuff, carbon nanotubes or something) make it work again. |
Send message Joined: 7 May 14 Posts: 57 Credit: 206,540,646 RAC: 34 |
my boinc playlist gpu calculations all videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYVW9oA9yWk&list=PL_r97NUMjf7x4TgZT3bwQYL8KV_Vbo2J8 |
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 11 Posts: 205 Credit: 2,900,464 RAC: 0 |
Is there a bit of a problem waiting for validation is steadily heading north to 700,000 units ? |
Send message Joined: 28 May 17 Posts: 76 Credit: 4,398,910,125 RAC: 2,255 |
Yes, the pendings started climbing at an alarming rate not too long ago. https://grafana.kiska.pw/d/boinc/boinc?orgId=1&var-project=milkyway@home&from=now-7d&to=now&viewPanel=3 Even surprising the spike that happened back during the FB Sprint when one team dropped all their bunkers. I'm currently sitting at nearly 60k pendings myself. |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 |
Does it matter? Just keep crunching and let them pile up, somebody will sort it eventually. There's always an enormous queue waiting on us, why get upset when there's a tiny queue waiting on them? |
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 11 Posts: 205 Credit: 2,900,464 RAC: 0 |
Does it matter? Just keep crunching and let them pile up, somebody will sort it eventually. No it probably doesn’t, just making an observation.. |
Send message Joined: 28 May 17 Posts: 76 Credit: 4,398,910,125 RAC: 2,255 |
If the admins aren't aware of the issue then the disk(s) will potentially fill up. When that happens no new tasks will be created and no tasks will be able to be uploaded. Thus, halting the progress of the project until it's sorted. |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 |
If the admins aren't aware of the issue then the disk(s) will potentially fill up. When that happens no new tasks will be created and no tasks will be able to be uploaded. Thus, halting the progress of the project until it's sorted.Nothing we can do about it. If the admins are at work, they'll notice. Unless you know one is on vacation and you can tell him and he can fix it remotely. |
Send message Joined: 8 May 09 Posts: 3339 Credit: 524,010,781 RAC: 0 |
If the admins aren't aware of the issue then the disk(s) will potentially fill up. When that happens no new tasks will be created and no tasks will be able to be uploaded. Thus, halting the progress of the project until it's sorted. It usually takes a physical on site reboot of the Server to fix things, and they don't stop making new tasks, they just keep on making tasks even though the other Server is no longer validating tasks very fast. |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 |
I thought a remote reboot might be possible.It usually takes a physical on site reboot of the Server to fix things, and they don't stop making new tasks, they just keep on making tasks even though the other Server is no longer validating tasks very fast.If the admins aren't aware of the issue then the disk(s) will potentially fill up. When that happens no new tasks will be created and no tasks will be able to be uploaded. Thus, halting the progress of the project until it's sorted.Nothing we can do about it. If the admins are at work, they'll notice. Unless you know one is on vacation and you can tell him and he can fix it remotely. Presumably these tasks don't take up much disk space, if they do, they'd just queue up on our computers to send back. It's not that many really, a similar number to how many we all have on our computers. |
Send message Joined: 8 May 09 Posts: 3339 Credit: 524,010,781 RAC: 0 |
It usually takes a physical on site reboot of the Server to fix things, and they don't stop making new tasks, they just keep on making tasks even though the other Server is no longer validating tasks very fast.[quote]If the admins aren't aware of the issue then the disk(s) will potentially fill up. When that happens no new tasks will be created and no tasks will be able to be uploaded. Thus, halting the progress of the project until it's sorted.Nothing we can do about it. If the admins are at work, they'll notice. Unless you know one is on vacation and you can tell him and he can fix it remotely. I thought a remote reboot might be possible.[/quite] It should be but Tom the previous Admin said it almost never worked for him Presumably these tasks don't take up much disk space, if they do, they'd just queue up on our computers to send back. Hopefully, though they did just release new N-Body runs and a couple people says they are taking days to run not hours. |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 11 Posts: 990 Credit: 376,143,149 RAC: 0 |
I thought a remote reboot might be possible.[/quite]Quite :-) It should be but Tom the previous Admin said it almost never worked for himProbably a lazy server which needed a size 10 boot. I wonder if that's where the term "booting a computer" came from. Hopefully, though they did just release new N-Body runs and a couple people says they are taking days to run not hours.14 minutes to 7 hours, last ones I did, February, Ryzen 3900XT 12 cores per task. I wonder what the long ones mean. New way of calculating? Something interesting found? |
Send message Joined: 12 Jun 10 Posts: 57 Credit: 6,171,817 RAC: 6 |
I am more than happy to assist with processing any work I get especially tasks with _2 or more. Should I process a more tasks when my current work queue is clear or wait for the validation queue to drop? |
Send message Joined: 8 May 09 Posts: 3339 Credit: 524,010,781 RAC: 0 |
I thought a remote reboot might be possible.[/quite]Quite :-) Tom always said the beginning of the runs were taking longer calculate than the ends of the runs, don't know if that applies this time though. |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group