Admin Updates Discussion

Author	Message
Lem Novantotto Send message Joined: 7 Sep 23 Posts: 1 Credit: 299,882 RAC: 5,836	Message 77727 - Posted: 20 Nov 2025, 9:30:22 UTC - in response to Message 77722. Last modified: 20 Nov 2025, 9:35:08 UTC wrong message, sorry. ID: 77727 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Link Send message Joined: 19 Jul 10 Posts: 775 Credit: 20,502,551 RAC: 9,758	Message 77734 - Posted: 21 Nov 2025, 10:02:50 UTC You might have a bad batch in the mix: de_nbody_orbit_fitting_11_18_2025_v194_OCS_north__data__01_1763492010_30918 de_nbody_orbit_fitting_11_18_2025_v194_OCS_north__data__01_1763492010_10155 This is likely the important part of std_err output, we had that before IIRC: hackCofM: tree structure error. ID: 77734 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Cavalary Send message Joined: 23 Aug 11 Posts: 58 Credit: 18,324,988 RAC: 21,589	Message 77746 - Posted: 24 Nov 2025, 22:52:12 UTC Yep, adding some to that list https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=1011257970 https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=1011372731 https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=1011348052 Also a weird one, 2 validated it, I got invalid (NaN likelihood), 3 others had error: https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=1011345773 And here I got an apparently valid result that ended up being considered invalid because two others had the NaN likelihood one: https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=1011313870 ID: 77746 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote