Welcome to MilkyWay@home

v0.17 for windows


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : v0.17 for windows
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9181 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 3:46:23 UTC

Let me know if they're signing correctly now.
ID: 9181 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDebs

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 09
Posts: 169
Credit: 6,734,481
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9182 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 3:50:42 UTC

I've just downloaded 6 v0.17 tasks on my C2D running XP64, so hopefully for now it's running fine :)
ID: 9182 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGlenn Rogers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 08
Posts: 165
Credit: 364,966
RAC: 0
100 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9185 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 3:54:48 UTC - in response to Message 9181.  

Hi Travis been getting checksum errors for ver 0.16 my client has not tried to dowload ver 0.17 as yet will put a copy of my messages here. Hope you can sort it.
Glenn.

26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Starting BOINC client version 6.4.5 for windows_intelx86
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Data directory: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Running under account Glenn Rogers
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 14 Stepping 8]
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Home x86 Editon, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00)
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Memory: 510.11 MB physical, 1.83 GB virtual
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Disk: 43.88 GB total, 32.31 GB free
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Local time is UTC +9 hours
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Not using a proxy
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||No CUDA devices found
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||No coprocessors
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM|Milkyway@home|URL: http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/; Computer ID: 21898; location: home; project prefs: home
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||General prefs: from Milkyway@home (last modified 20-Dec-2008 17:01:36)
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Computer location: home
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||General prefs: using separate prefs for home
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Reading preferences override file
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Preferences limit memory usage when active to 255.05MB
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Preferences limit memory usage when idle to 484.60MB
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM||Preferences limit disk usage to 10.00GB
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM|Milkyway@home|Restarting task nm_s86_l27_135421_1232899247_0 using milkyway version 14
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM|Milkyway@home|Restarting task nm_s86_l27_135422_1232899247_0 using milkyway version 14
26/01/2009 12:40:05 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 193978 seconds of work, reporting 2 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:40:20 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks
26/01/2009 12:40:23 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of milkyway_0.16_windows_intelx86.exe
26/01/2009 12:40:23 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of nm_s79_e28_search_parameters_71535_1232941193
26/01/2009 12:40:31 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 170981 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:40:34 PM|Milkyway@home|Finished download of nm_s79_e28_search_parameters_71535_1232941193
26/01/2009 12:40:34 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of nm_s82_l28_search_parameters_68729_1232940513
26/01/2009 12:40:35 PM|Milkyway@home|Finished download of nm_s82_l28_search_parameters_68729_1232940513
26/01/2009 12:40:44 PM|Milkyway@home|Finished download of milkyway_0.16_windows_intelx86.exe
26/01/2009 12:40:44 PM|Milkyway@home|[error] Signature verification failed for milkyway_0.16_windows_intelx86.exe
26/01/2009 12:40:44 PM|Milkyway@home|[error] Checksum or signature error for milkyway_0.16_windows_intelx86.exe
26/01/2009 12:40:53 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
26/01/2009 12:40:55 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
26/01/2009 12:40:56 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server
26/01/2009 12:41:57 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 194185 seconds of work, reporting 2 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:42:19 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
26/01/2009 12:42:21 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
26/01/2009 12:42:22 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server
26/01/2009 12:43:22 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 194492 seconds of work, reporting 2 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:43:37 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks
26/01/2009 12:43:39 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of milkyway_0.17_windows_intelx86.exe
26/01/2009 12:43:39 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71701_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:43:47 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 171741 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:44:01 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
26/01/2009 12:44:01 PM|Milkyway@home|Temporarily failed download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71701_1232941197: connect() failed
26/01/2009 12:44:01 PM|Milkyway@home|Backing off 1 min 0 sec on download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71701_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:44:01 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71702_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:44:02 PM|Milkyway@home|Finished download of milkyway_0.17_windows_intelx86.exe
26/01/2009 12:44:02 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/01/2009 12:44:02 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: No work sent
26/01/2009 12:44:02 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: (reached per-CPU limit of 8 tasks)
26/01/2009 12:44:03 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
26/01/2009 12:44:22 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
26/01/2009 12:44:22 PM|Milkyway@home|Temporarily failed download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71702_1232941197: connect() failed
26/01/2009 12:44:22 PM|Milkyway@home|Backing off 1 min 0 sec on download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71702_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:44:24 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
26/01/2009 12:45:01 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71701_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:45:23 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71702_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:45:24 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
26/01/2009 12:45:24 PM|Milkyway@home|Temporarily failed download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71701_1232941197: connect() failed
26/01/2009 12:45:24 PM|Milkyway@home|Backing off 1 min 0 sec on download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71701_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:45:26 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
26/01/2009 12:45:33 PM|Milkyway@home|Finished download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71702_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:46:24 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71701_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:46:37 PM|Milkyway@home|Finished download of nm_s82_e28_search_parameters_71701_1232941197
26/01/2009 12:47:03 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 172550 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:47:18 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/01/2009 12:47:18 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: No work sent
26/01/2009 12:47:18 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: (reached per-CPU limit of 8 tasks)
26/01/2009 12:48:18 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 172863 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:48:28 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/01/2009 12:48:28 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: No work sent
26/01/2009 12:48:28 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: (reached per-CPU limit of 8 tasks)
26/01/2009 12:49:29 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 173160 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:49:39 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/01/2009 12:49:39 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: No work sent
26/01/2009 12:49:39 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: (reached per-CPU limit of 8 tasks)
26/01/2009 12:50:39 PM|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 173459 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
26/01/2009 12:50:49 PM|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
26/01/2009 12:50:49 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: No work sent
26/01/2009 12:50:49 PM|Milkyway@home|Message from server: (reached per-CPU limit of 8 tasks)

ID: 9185 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGlenn Rogers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 08
Posts: 165
Credit: 364,966
RAC: 0
100 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9186 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 3:59:11 UTC

Just got ver 0.17 in will see how it goes will let you know if i have any problems. There seems to be a problem with your server keep getting errors contacting the server.
Glenn
ID: 9186 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDebs

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 09
Posts: 169
Credit: 6,734,481
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9187 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 4:00:52 UTC - in response to Message 9185.  

Hi Travis been getting checksum errors for ver 0.16 my client has not tried to dowload ver 0.17 as yet will put a copy of my messages here. Hope you can sort it.
Glenn.

26/01/2009 12:43:39 PM|Milkyway@home|Started download of milkyway_0.17_windows_intelx86.exe
26/01/2009 12:44:02 PM|Milkyway@home|Finished download of milkyway_0.17_windows_intelx86.exe


Did you read your message file before you posted? The above shows that v0.16 failed once, then at the next connection it was at v0.17, which succeeded (as quoted above...) :)
ID: 9187 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDebs

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 09
Posts: 169
Credit: 6,734,481
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9188 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 4:01:57 UTC

Ah, I see you spotted it had loaded :)

I think we are all having trouble accessing the servers. Their bandwidth just isn't sufficient for a project like this at busy times :(
ID: 9188 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9189 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 4:05:12 UTC - in response to Message 9188.  

Ah, I see you spotted it had loaded :)

I think we are all having trouble accessing the servers. Their bandwidth just isn't sufficient for a project like this at busy times :(


The server is probably having issues from all the bad v0.16 windows clients out there :P As more 0.17s get out there it should be more available.
ID: 9189 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGavin Shaw
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 08
Posts: 98
Credit: 1,371,299
RAC: 0
1 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9190 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 4:06:17 UTC

Is the 0.17 version going into the code release dir?

Or do we use 0.16 for optimising?

Never surrender and never give up. In the darkest hour there is always hope.

ID: 9190 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9191 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 4:07:46 UTC - in response to Message 9190.  

Is the 0.17 version going into the code release dir?

Or do we use 0.16 for optimising?


v0.17 for windows is the exact same as v0.16 just with a correct signature, so there's no new code to be released.
ID: 9191 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDebs

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 09
Posts: 169
Credit: 6,734,481
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9192 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 4:09:20 UTC

Cool, coz I'm currently downloading a few compilers and waiting to buy another just to try different options for compiling this :)
ID: 9192 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileMary
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 08
Posts: 32
Credit: 281,582
RAC: 0
100 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9193 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 4:12:26 UTC

It looks like the signature issue has been fixed and all is running well so far. Thanks for fixing things.
~It only takes one bottle cap moving at 23,000 mph to ruin your whole day~

ID: 9193 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Alinator

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 08
Posts: 464
Credit: 56,639,936
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9194 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 5:41:55 UTC
Last modified: 26 Jan 2009, 5:55:11 UTC

Hmmm...

It doesn't seem to want to run on NT4. I blew through about 60 tasks before I caught it.

Alinator
ID: 9194 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John Clark

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 08
Posts: 1734
Credit: 64,228,409
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9198 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 8:54:32 UTC
Last modified: 26 Jan 2009, 9:21:13 UTC

As reported earlier in this thread ...

The servers must of been hammered with requests for new work, as there was a large number of V0.16 download error reported on 3 of my PCs. All between 02.20am and 03.45am (app).

Downloads after then were OK, but I am only just starting to crunch V0.17 WUs. I assume these will be OK.

Just sent off the last of the V0.14 results, and it was OK. Now the first of my V0.17 WUs will report in the next 10 minutes.

The 2 V0.17 reported, validated and were awarded credit OK on my fastest rig.
ID: 9198 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Kimegi Tepeex

Send message
Joined: 15 Nov 08
Posts: 5
Credit: 20,002,399
RAC: 0
20 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9221 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 19:42:25 UTC - in response to Message 9194.  

Hmmm...

It doesn't seem to want to run on NT4. I blew through about 60 tasks before I caught it.

Alinator


Nor does it under Win98SE, as reported in "v0.14 comments" thread.
All tasks abort immediately with a "process creation failed" message.
I think that it is caused by the new code using an API function which is not supported by older OSes.

Regards,
K.T.
ID: 9221 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9223 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 20:47:30 UTC - in response to Message 9221.  

Hmmm...

It doesn't seem to want to run on NT4. I blew through about 60 tasks before I caught it.

Alinator


Nor does it under Win98SE, as reported in "v0.14 comments" thread.
All tasks abort immediately with a "process creation failed" message.
I think that it is caused by the new code using an API function which is not supported by older OSes.

Regards,
K.T.


I think Dave might have upgraded his windows box and missed something when he recompiled BOINC. I'll have to ask him about it.
ID: 9223 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Misfit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 07
Posts: 915
Credit: 1,503,319
RAC: 0
1 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9246 - Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 1:58:09 UTC - in response to Message 9223.  

I think Dave might have upgraded his windows box and missed something when he recompiled BOINC. I'll have to ask him about it.

Recompiled BOINC? Which "Dave" are you talking about here? Just in case I'll wait for the SETI forum meltdown.
me@rescam.org
ID: 9246 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9248 - Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 2:00:07 UTC - in response to Message 9246.  

I think Dave might have upgraded his windows box and missed something when he recompiled BOINC. I'll have to ask him about it.

Recompiled BOINC? Which "Dave" are you talking about here? Just in case I'll wait for the SETI forum meltdown.


Dave P. our undergrad who compiles all the windows applications. Not Dave A. :)
ID: 9248 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Misfit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 07
Posts: 915
Credit: 1,503,319
RAC: 0
1 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9250 - Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 2:02:18 UTC - in response to Message 9248.  

I think Dave might have upgraded his windows box and missed something when he recompiled BOINC. I'll have to ask him about it.

Recompiled BOINC? Which "Dave" are you talking about here? Just in case I'll wait for the SETI forum meltdown.

Dave P. our undergrad who compiles all the windows applications. Not Dave A. :)

An undergrad? Wow. I outrank him. (No smelly jokes allowed.)
me@rescam.org
ID: 9250 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9255 - Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 3:42:39 UTC - in response to Message 9250.  

I think Dave might have upgraded his windows box and missed something when he recompiled BOINC. I'll have to ask him about it.

Recompiled BOINC? Which "Dave" are you talking about here? Just in case I'll wait for the SETI forum meltdown.

Dave P. our undergrad who compiles all the windows applications. Not Dave A. :)

An undergrad? Wow. I outrank him. (No smelly jokes allowed.)


Yeah, the undergraduates get stuck with windows. :D Just kidding :)
ID: 9255 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Alinator

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 08
Posts: 464
Credit: 56,639,936
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge10 year member badge
Message 9274 - Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 21:33:53 UTC - in response to Message 9223.  


I think Dave might have upgraded his windows box and missed something when he recompiled BOINC. I'll have to ask him about it.


Hmmm...

Yep, that's been a common theme lately! ;-)

If he compiled it with the latest version of Visual Studio, the you lose NT4 and 9x compatability. :-(

VS2005 is the last one to have it, IIRC.

So the next question is, is it kosher to set up an app_info to specify v0.14 (stock) to run for the current tasks?

Alinator
ID: 9274 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : v0.17 for windows

©2020 Astroinformatics Group