Welcome to MilkyWay@home

new WUs

Message boards : Number crunching : new WUs
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Labbie
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 07
Posts: 327
Credit: 116,463,193
RAC: 0
Message 9810 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:00:33 UTC

What is the purge set at? The WUs seem to be disappearig pretty quick.


Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now
ID: 9810 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Misfit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 07
Posts: 915
Credit: 1,503,319
RAC: 0
Message 9812 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:01:23 UTC - in response to Message 9809.  


What you are seeing there is what SETI calls "radar interference".

I think that's what happened to our database...

You had radar interference or an 80' satellite dish up your a$$?
me@rescam.org
ID: 9812 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile banditwolf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 524,164
RAC: 0
Message 9813 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:01:35 UTC - in response to Message 9810.  

What is the purge set at? The WUs seem to be disappearig pretty quick.


Aside from the errored ones & aborts.
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.
ID: 9813 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Labbie
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 07
Posts: 327
Credit: 116,463,193
RAC: 0
Message 9814 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:02:58 UTC - in response to Message 9813.  

What is the purge set at? The WUs seem to be disappearig pretty quick.


Aside from the errored ones & aborts.


I haven't had any of those...yet.


Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now
ID: 9814 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Glenn Rogers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 08
Posts: 165
Credit: 364,966
RAC: 0
Message 9815 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:04:37 UTC - in response to Message 9804.  

I think that there should be some credit given for those lost in the myre of mw, on a pro rata sys or something. 24 on my system alone not to mention the people with multiple boxes crunching.
Glenn
ID: 9815 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Cluster Physik

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 08
Posts: 627
Credit: 94,940,203
RAC: 0
Message 9816 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:06:43 UTC - in response to Message 9806.  
Last modified: 7 Feb 2009, 3:08:42 UTC

If anything, the credit granted from the new searches, nm_x_r<1-5> should be higher than the older searches.

Travis, have you changed the settings for the credit limit? I see here 0.09 credits per second for the GPU app, but still 0.03 credits per second for the CPU. Or is this dependend on the WU and just random. Would be nice to have the limit for the GPU app a bit higher ;)
ID: 9816 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile banditwolf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 524,164
RAC: 0
Message 9817 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:11:39 UTC - in response to Message 9809.  


What you are seeing there is what SETI calls "radar interference".


I think that's what happened to our database...


No I think this is what happened:


Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.
ID: 9817 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Travis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
Message 9818 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:12:40 UTC - in response to Message 9816.  

If anything, the credit granted from the new searches, nm_x_r<1-5> should be higher than the older searches.

Travis, have you changed the settings for the credit limit? I see here 0.09 credits per second for the GPU app, but still 0.03 credits per second for the CPU. Or is this dependend on the WU and just random. Would be nice to have the limit for the GPU app a bit higher ;)


I set the limit for GPU apps a bit higher, considering the pain in the butt it is to run them.
ID: 9818 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gavin Shaw
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 08
Posts: 98
Credit: 1,371,299
RAC: 0
Message 9819 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:15:24 UTC - in response to Message 9812.  


What you are seeing there is what SETI calls "radar interference".

I think that's what happened to our database...

You had radar interference or an 80' satellite dish up your a$$?


Imagine if I had an 80' dish.

Then imagine what the neighbours would think if I put it in the backyard...

Never surrender and never give up. In the darkest hour there is always hope.

ID: 9819 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Cluster Physik

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 08
Posts: 627
Credit: 94,940,203
RAC: 0
Message 9820 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 3:20:07 UTC - in response to Message 9818.  

If anything, the credit granted from the new searches, nm_x_r<1-5> should be higher than the older searches.

Travis, have you changed the settings for the credit limit? I see here 0.09 credits per second for the GPU app, but still 0.03 credits per second for the CPU. Or is this dependend on the WU and just random. Would be nice to have the limit for the GPU app a bit higher ;)


I set the limit for GPU apps a bit higher, considering the pain in the butt it is to run them.

Hey thanks! But you know it is way faster than any CPU and will still get less than a quad core. But for the time being (alpha test phase) it may be okay just to hurt the testers not too much for running it ;)
ID: 9820 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bobgoblin

Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 07
Posts: 60
Credit: 67,028,931
RAC: 0
Message 9837 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 5:16:47 UTC - in response to Message 9820.  

i've been running the gpu thingy since sunday and only had problems twice. both times wu's locked up, and I would have to abort all 16 running work units to free things up and allow new wu's to process.

the 2nd time it happened i was actually at the machine: vista popped up an error that the graphics drivers stopped responding and it restarted them. that's when the wu's locked up. but once i aborted all 16, the next batch took off fine.

i just installed the new version you posted. i'm hoping new wu's are released before i go to bed to make sure nothing bad happens...
ID: 9837 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GalaxyIce
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 08
Posts: 2018
Credit: 100,142,856
RAC: 0
Message 9851 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 8:03:09 UTC

No WUs coming through at the moment;

Database/file status
State #
Results ready to send 0
Results in progress 28,386
Workunits waiting for validation 0
Workunits waiting for assimilation 0
Workunits waiting for deletion 0
Results waiting for deletion 0
Transitioner backlog (hours) 0


ID: 9851 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Misfit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 07
Posts: 915
Credit: 1,503,319
RAC: 0
Message 9860 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 8:45:50 UTC - in response to Message 9851.  

No WUs coming through at the moment;

Front page news. There won't be any work today. (Allegedly.)
me@rescam.org
ID: 9860 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Bob in FL

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 08
Posts: 5
Credit: 2,547,855
RAC: 0
Message 9881 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 12:57:51 UTC

I didn't look at all my systems but the one that I did check, the credit looks the same as before the downtime. However, since the downtime, of the units it has crunched, about 20% have been awarded credit and the remaining 80% are pending. I'm not used to seeing work units in the pending state here.
ID: 9881 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John Clark

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 08
Posts: 1734
Credit: 64,228,409
RAC: 0
Message 9910 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 20:18:16 UTC

Travis/Dave

Any information as to when you think you might be able to split and issue new work?

I have watched the Server status showing the results in progress slowly coming down from about 20K during today, and the Transitioner backlog time growing from 3 hours.

Results ready to send 0
Results in progress 7,747
Workunits waiting for validation 0
Workunits waiting for assimilation 0
Workunits waiting for deletion 0
Results waiting for deletion 0
Transitioner backlog (hours) 13

From the rate of fall of the work in progress, and the transitioner catching up on it's backlog, can you give a UTC time indication of when the splitters might be started?

This assumes you do not hit any other issue with the servers.
ID: 9910 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Cappy [Team Musketeers]
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 07
Posts: 71
Credit: 33,212,009
RAC: 0
Message 9912 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 20:43:17 UTC

yes any news on when we are going to be seeing new wu's????
ID: 9912 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Travis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
Message 9913 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 20:45:30 UTC - in response to Message 9912.  

yes any news on when we are going to be seeing new wu's????


Not quite sure... Something is wrong with our mysqld, it's taking up pretty much all milkyway's CPU and not letting the transitioner do anyting -- so even since i've generated a bit of work it's not getting out to you guys. We're trying to figure out what's wrong.

Unfortunately I don't have an ETA yet :(
ID: 9913 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Debs

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 09
Posts: 169
Credit: 6,734,481
RAC: 0
Message 9915 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 20:47:58 UTC

More to the point, if 80% of work done since the system came online last night has not yet been validated, why does the server status say "Workunits waiting for validation 0 "?
ID: 9915 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Travis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
Message 9916 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 20:50:06 UTC - in response to Message 9915.  

More to the point, if 80% of work done since the system came online last night has not yet been validated, why does the server status say "Workunits waiting for validation 0 "?


We're having some problem with something hammering the database, which is making the transitioner do nothing, which I think is the issue... trying to track it down.
ID: 9916 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile banditwolf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 524,164
RAC: 0
Message 9918 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 20:54:40 UTC - in response to Message 9916.  


We're having some problem with something hammering the database, which is making the transitioner do nothing, which I think is the issue... trying to track it down.


Probably a few giant pharms wanting thousands of wu's.
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.
ID: 9918 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : new WUs

©2024 Astroinformatics Group