Remember, we measure in Cobblestones as opposed to Whetstones, Dhrystones, or Flintstones ...

And Soapstones, surely... :)

How about limestone?

For all the pain and effort - kidneystones. ;)

Gullstones?!

What about grindstones?

Remember, we measure in Cobblestones as opposed to Whetstones, Dhrystones, or Flintstones ...

And Soapstones, surely... :)

How about limestone?

For all the pain and effort - kidneystones. ;)

Gullstones?!

What about grindstones?

Or loadstones?

---

Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now

LOL...

Just as long as it isn't rhinestones! :-)

Alinator

LOL...

Just as long as it isn't rhinestones! :-)

Alinator

Hm, then Rolling Stones? ;-D

---

Lovely greetings, Cori

LOL...

Just as long as it isn't rhinestones! :-)

Alinator

Hm, then Rolling Stones? ;-D

Talk about ancient...!!

...
It's also a Q6600 with 2GB RAM with a fresh BOINC install, running Seti stock and MW stock at 50/50 rate.

Host at Milkyway
same Host at Seti

On the Seti side it's set to crunch Multibeam only.
...

I just ended my little experiment. Here are the numbers:

MW: 4827
Seti: 4619 (including pending up to now)

I expected MW to be a bit higher, but it's still not below Seti. :)

Now I put the opti apps back in place to get more...

---

mic.

[unashamed off topic]

Hm, then Rolling Stones? ;-D

Talk about ancient...!!

Oi! watch it you lot. I was around in Richmond upon Thames in the early 1960's when they first started out..... And I'm still firing on all 6 cylinders.... :-))

[/unashamed off topic]

...
It's also a Q6600 with 2GB RAM with a fresh BOINC install, running Seti stock and MW stock at 50/50 rate.

Host at Milkyway
same Host at Seti

On the Seti side it's set to crunch Multibeam only.
...

I just ended my little experiment. Here are the numbers:

MW: 4827
Seti: 4619 (including pending up to now)

I expected MW to be a bit higher, but it's still not below Seti. :)

Now I put the opti apps back in place to get more...

Well done for doing that mic.

It makes me wonder where it leaves all those claiming that no project awards higher than SETI. And well done Travis for a good credit pitch.

---

It makes me wonder where it leaves all those claiming that no project awards higher than SETI. And well done Travis for a good credit pitch.

12 credits per second isn't bad. ;)

---

me@rescam.org

Remember, we measure in Cobblestones as opposed to Whetstones, Dhrystones, or Flintstones ...

And Soapstones, surely... :)

How about limestone?

For all the pain and effort - kidneystones. ;)

Gullstones?!

What about grindstones?

Or loadstones?

If we could only get gemstones instead of cobblestones for our work.

---

4870 GPU
4870 GPU

<snip>

Unit 8:

300 MHz K6 running NT4 Server SP6a, 192 MB RAM

<snip>

Just an update for Unit 8. Turns out it has been running the stock SAH app since last September.

I switched it over to check the NT4 compatibility workaround, and then must have decided to keep it stock.

Alinator

Not been very exciting...ZZzzzzzzzzz....

---

Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.

It makes me wonder where it leaves all those claiming that no project awards higher than SETI. And well done Travis for a good credit pitch.

Here's some info for you: Not all CPU/OS combinations give the same results.




The SETI version is the optimized AK version; the MW is also supposed to be optimized. This comparison is why I put my Intel Macs back on SETI full time - it's a waste of my time and electric bill to run MW at these credit levels.

C

It makes me wonder where it leaves all those claiming that no project awards higher than SETI. And well done Travis for a good credit pitch.

Here's some info for you: Not all CPU/OS combinations give the same results.




The SETI version is the optimized AK version; the MW is also supposed to be optimized. This comparison is why I put my Intel Macs back on SETI full time - it's a waste of my time and electric bill to run MW at these credit levels.

C

The OS X application doesn't seem to be hugely optimized. I'm going to take a crack at it in the coming days.

---

It makes me wonder where it leaves all those claiming that no project awards higher than SETI. And well done Travis for a good credit pitch.

Here's some info for you: Not all CPU/OS combinations give the same results.




The SETI version is the optimized AK version; the MW is also supposed to be optimized. This comparison is why I put my Intel Macs back on SETI full time - it's a waste of my time and electric bill to run MW at these credit levels.

C

The OS X application doesn't seem to be hugely optimized. I'm going to take a crack at it in the coming days.

I'm glad that it's not just a case of which is better, but running tests like this to see if improvements can be made for MilkyWay.

---

From the way I read it Milkway is giving nearly 1.3 times the amount of credit per host running both projects than SETI. I wonder how the GPU crunching is affecting this statistic?

From the way I read it Milkway is giving nearly 1.3 times the amount of credit per host running both projects than SETI. I wonder how the GPU crunching is affecting this statistic?

Looking at this chart I read MW giving about 1.625 times what seti is giving.
1.3 divided through 0.8.

---

Dragons can fly because they don't fit into pirate ships!

From the way I read it Milkway is giving nearly 1.3 times the amount of credit per host running both projects than SETI. I wonder how the GPU crunching is affecting this statistic?

Looking at this chart I read MW giving about 1.625 times what seti is giving.
1.3 divided through 0.8.

I think the chart reads that Mw is 1.3x seti or seti is .8x of mw. If one is base (1) than the other is multiplied (X).

*edit* took chart image off.

---

Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.

Ok, thanks. Now I understand what had been my error.
Yeah, the 1.3 and the 0.8 are corresponding.

---

Dragons can fly because they don't fit into pirate ships!

Ok, thanks. Now I understand what had been my error.
Yeah, the 1.3 and the 0.8 are corresponding.

Yea, not the best layout.

---

Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.