Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
The GPU ripple
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0 |
Yes! NO! Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. |
Send message Joined: 6 Apr 08 Posts: 2018 Credit: 100,142,856 RAC: 0 |
Yes! Amazing. And I got 12.961071 credits for it. |
Send message Joined: 6 Apr 08 Posts: 2018 Credit: 100,142,856 RAC: 0 |
It had to happen sooner or later. The first sub-one second ;)
|
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0 |
And people thought my suggestion of 1 credit per second was too much. me@rescam.org |
Send message Joined: 6 Apr 08 Posts: 2018 Credit: 100,142,856 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 6 Apr 08 Posts: 2018 Credit: 100,142,856 RAC: 0 |
I've just updated my profile and added this;
|
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 32,148,082 RAC: 0 |
I followed these instructions and it says 'waiting to run' on the milky way tasks. I have a dummy plug in the card since it isn't my primary. Is there a way to check to see if it is active? |
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0 |
And people thought my suggestion of 1 credit per second was too much. So what does it take to get 355K credits in just 4 days? me@rescam.org |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 09 Posts: 169 Credit: 6,734,481 RAC: 0 |
And people thought my suggestion of 1 credit per second was too much. A RAC of 88750 ? |
Send message Joined: 26 Jan 09 Posts: 589 Credit: 497,834,261 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 |
I followed these instructions and it says 'waiting to run' on the milky way tasks. I have a dummy plug in the card since it isn't my primary. Is there a way to check to see if it is active? Carl If you Google for GPU-Z (version 0.3.2 latest), it can be found on the TechPowerUp web site. The middle tab will show the GPU temperature, the fan speed the the percentage of GPU capacity used. So, that will show the GPU is working. Go away, I was asleep |
Send message Joined: 26 Jan 09 Posts: 589 Credit: 497,834,261 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Apr 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 32,148,082 RAC: 0 |
Well I had it running and everything installed and so on and so forth. Then it started crashing all of the tasks immediately. <core_client_version>6.6.20</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741515 (0xc0000135) </message> ]]> I don't know what that means, it's going to be a stand alone machine so I'll format and start over. |
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 180 Credit: 27,806,824 RAC: 0 |
Well I had it running and everything installed and so on and so forth. Then it started crashing all of the tasks immediately. I solved this by installing .Net Framework 3.5 |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 |
Well I had it running and everything installed and so on and so forth. Then it started crashing all of the tasks immediately. The Microsoft update Tuesday is over, but the patches still need downloading. I have just completed the updating (manually) on 2 PCs - 1 and old Win2K one which needed 35MB of update, and the other an XP pro rig which needed 27.8MB of updated. None of which required any .NET updates, which suggests it is present on these Win PCs. My older Server, running XP Pro, is just downloading the same update patches (again manually) and this includes .NET. The download totals 283.5MB of patches, including a 248.0MB download of .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and .NET Framework Family Update. This updating is going to take over 1.5 hours on a 0.5Mbps broadband line. I wonder if the GPU will be affected, ot what? Go away, I was asleep |
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 180 Credit: 27,806,824 RAC: 0 |
My windows updates (XP Pro 32-bit) never, ever, call for .Net Framework, thus I have to download the setup tool and do it that way. From older threads, for some reason .Net 3.5 just seemed to work, but it wasn't figured out why. I didn't go for 3.5 SP1 though, and it all works my end without 3.5 SP1. You could download the standalone .Net 3.0 file, then copy it across your machines, then update to 3.5 on each. On a different note, I didn't realise broadband in the UK was still sold at 512kbps :S Well, unless you're in Hull where you have to use the local provider Karoo as BT doesn't have lines there, but even they are slowly upgrading all their lines for free to 1MB... |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 |
[quote I didn't realise broadband in the UK was still sold at 512kbps :S Well, unless you're in Hull where you have to use the local provider Karoo as BT doesn't have lines there, but even they are slowly upgrading all their lines for free to 1MB...[/quote] Only for me, and BB users like myself. I was offered ADSLMax, the line rate adaption system, but as I required stability I stuck with the plain 512kbps ADSL. The reason for this is the line length from the exchange (8 km/5 miles), meaning the attenuation and SNR is OK but marginal. Go away, I was asleep |
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 180 Credit: 27,806,824 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 |
5 miles? Geez, out in the sticks? =P I am on the so called 8MB, but it drops with the length of the line. My attenuation down is 63.5 db, and the SNR varies between 10 db and 14db. I believe I could get 1=MB with ADSL Max, but I am not sure as the SNR would be in the area of BB desynchronization. Go away, I was asleep |
Send message Joined: 26 Jan 09 Posts: 589 Credit: 497,834,261 RAC: 0 |
>I didn't realise broadband in the UK was still sold at 512kbps ISPs in Britain, and probably most other places, call anything faster than dialup 'broadband'. So you can have, here in Oz anyway, 128kbps 'broadband'. Its advertising, therefore its lies. It might be the big lie, it might be a small lie, but its still... :) Cheers, PeterV . |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group