Welcome to MilkyWay@home

new workunit queue size (6)


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : new workunit queue size (6)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 6 · Next

AuthorMessage
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13057 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:28:43 UTC

Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.
ID: 13057 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGalaxyIce
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 08
Posts: 2018
Credit: 100,142,856
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13058 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:33:16 UTC - in response to Message 13057.  
Last modified: 27 Feb 2009, 16:35:23 UTC

Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.

Looking forward to it Travis, but right now I have this;

27/02/2009 16:31:35|Milkyway@home|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance

No work availabilty just now

[edit] I just got a task. Whooohoooo! :)

ID: 13058 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13059 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:34:12 UTC - in response to Message 13058.  

Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.

Looking forward to it Travis, but right now I have this;

27/02/2009 16:31:35|Milkyway@home|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance

No work availabilty just now


Yeah, I just restarted the server :P Work should start flowing now.
ID: 13059 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ

Send message
Joined: 27 Dec 07
Posts: 14
Credit: 5,089,974
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13060 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:36:08 UTC - in response to Message 13057.  

Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.


Not really

27/02/2009 17:34:31 Milkyway@home Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
27/02/2009 17:34:31 Milkyway@home Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
27/02/2009 17:34:36 Milkyway@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
27/02/2009 17:35:07 Milkyway@home Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
27/02/2009 17:35:07 Milkyway@home Requesting new tasks
27/02/2009 17:35:12 Milkyway@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks


:(
ID: 13060 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileNeal Chantrill
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Jan 09
Posts: 98
Credit: 72,182,367
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13061 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:37:24 UTC

Still nothing here.
ID: 13061 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGalaxyIce
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 08
Posts: 2018
Credit: 100,142,856
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13062 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:37:37 UTC - in response to Message 13059.  
Last modified: 27 Feb 2009, 16:45:35 UTC

Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.

Looking forward to it Travis, but right now I have this;

27/02/2009 16:31:35|Milkyway@home|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance

No work availabilty just now


Yeah, I just restarted the server :P Work should start flowing now.

Yes, I just got a task, but no more;

27/02/2009 16:36:26|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 1745280 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
27/02/2009 16:36:32|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks


ID: 13062 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Alinator

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 08
Posts: 464
Credit: 56,639,936
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13064 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:42:27 UTC
Last modified: 27 Feb 2009, 16:46:51 UTC

Hmmm...

Insta-Purge seems to back to. :-(

UGGGHHH! PITA time again for data logging.

<edit> It seems to me that if you cannot even accommodate a 1 hour delay in purging the completed tasks, then you have a serious overbooking and/or backend capacity problem that allowing more work out in the field is not going to help one iota.

Alinator
ID: 13064 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGalaxyIce
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 08
Posts: 2018
Credit: 100,142,856
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13065 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:44:02 UTC

Nothing at all since that one task;

27/02/2009 16:43:14|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks



ID: 13065 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JAMC

Send message
Joined: 9 Sep 08
Posts: 96
Credit: 336,443,946
RAC: 0
300 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13067 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:46:22 UTC

> got 49 WU's on one machine, 50 WU's on another but these are the exception... mostly '0 new tasks' after repeated manual primes...
ID: 13067 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13068 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:49:50 UTC - in response to Message 13067.  

It's gonna take the server awhile to catch up I think. Give it a little time :)
ID: 13068 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Alinator

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 08
Posts: 464
Credit: 56,639,936
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13069 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:50:30 UTC

Well I haven't been following their work feeder problem that closely. However, in general BOINC terms, if you cannot transition enough work fast enough into the schedulers limited size queue, then this is what you end up seeing even if there is plenty of tasks coming out of the work generator(s).

Alinator
ID: 13069 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
David @ TPS

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 08
Posts: 24
Credit: 2,561,361
RAC: 0
2 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13071 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:53:58 UTC

Just got 80 for the Quad.
ID: 13071 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGalaxyIce
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 08
Posts: 2018
Credit: 100,142,856
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13072 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 16:56:32 UTC


OK, I just got a bunch through. It was quite a shock to see so many :P


ID: 13072 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JAMC

Send message
Joined: 9 Sep 08
Posts: 96
Credit: 336,443,946
RAC: 0
300 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13073 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 17:00:01 UTC - in response to Message 13072.  


OK, I just got a bunch through. It was quite a shock to see so many :P


Change can be good :)
ID: 13073 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
gomeyer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 08
Posts: 12
Credit: 1,228,382
RAC: 0
1 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13074 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 17:02:25 UTC

Yup, the new limit came down right away on two machines with one manual update. Looks good so far.
ID: 13074 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13075 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 17:03:29 UTC - in response to Message 13069.  

Well I haven't been following their work feeder problem that closely. However, in general BOINC terms, if you cannot transition enough work fast enough into the schedulers limited size queue, then this is what you end up seeing even if there is plenty of tasks coming out of the work generator(s).

Alinator


Yeah, I'm thinking this might be the problem. Now I just have to figure out how to increase the scheduler's queue size.
ID: 13075 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JAMC

Send message
Joined: 9 Sep 08
Posts: 96
Credit: 336,443,946
RAC: 0
300 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13079 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 17:45:32 UTC

I'm not seeing a reduction in the amount of '0 new tasks' and am not hitting the WU download limit.
ID: 13079 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfilePaul D. Buck

Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 08
Posts: 621
Credit: 161,934,067
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13081 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 18:10:52 UTC

Sitting idle here ... sigh ... when I checked the server page it said 500 available ... now 437 ... refetch master file, still nothing ...

ARRRRGGGGGHHHHH!

idle ATI GPU ... man this is depressing ...
ID: 13081 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Riil

Send message
Joined: 10 Feb 09
Posts: 13
Credit: 1,704,492
RAC: 0
1 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13088 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 18:22:06 UTC - in response to Message 13079.  

Nearly 80 new WU here aswell.
ID: 13088 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
BarryAZ

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 08
Posts: 520
Credit: 297,262,093
RAC: 124,727
200 million credit badge13 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 13089 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 18:41:46 UTC - in response to Message 13081.  

I'm wondering if one could code a script which would request an update at say 15 second intervals automatically -- that would eventually get work, of course hammering the server might not have the right effect if such a script got out in the wild....
ID: 13089 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 6 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : new workunit queue size (6)

©2022 Astroinformatics Group