Welcome to MilkyWay@home

new searches, ps_X_10


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : new searches, ps_X_10
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13135 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 22:59:34 UTC

let me know how the WUs for these are crunching here.
ID: 13135 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDebs

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 09
Posts: 169
Credit: 6,734,481
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13146 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 23:06:41 UTC

If we weren't back on insta-purge it would be easier to see how they are doing...
ID: 13146 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profilecaferace
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Aug 08
Posts: 46
Credit: 8,255,900
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13149 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 23:09:21 UTC - in response to Message 13146.  

If we weren't back on insta-purge it would be easier to see how they are doing...

or if there were wu's to get...

"State #
Results ready to send 0
Results in progress 128,286
Workunits waiting for validation 980"

-jim
ID: 13149 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ

Send message
Joined: 27 Dec 07
Posts: 14
Credit: 5,089,974
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13150 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 23:09:22 UTC

A lot of wu are granted to 0 because they are invalid ...

http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/results.php?hostid=49916&offset=20
ID: 13150 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Beau

Send message
Joined: 3 Jan 09
Posts: 270
Credit: 124,346
RAC: 0
100 thousand credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13155 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 23:13:40 UTC - in response to Message 13150.  

A lot of wu are granted to 0 because they are invalid ...

http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/results.php?hostid=49916&offset=20



But how to know that if they are purged instantly??

ID: 13155 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ

Send message
Joined: 27 Dec 07
Posts: 14
Credit: 5,089,974
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13157 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 23:16:29 UTC - in response to Message 13155.  
Last modified: 27 Feb 2009, 23:18:53 UTC

A lot of wu are granted to 0 because they are invalid ...

http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/results.php?hostid=49916&offset=20



But how to know that if they are purged instantly??



It's not instantly

12685202 12377796 27 Feb 2009 23:04:48 UTC 27 Feb 2009 23:13:04 UTC Over Success Done 1.98 0.01 13.77

On my second machine

12684102 12376726 27 Feb 2009 23:00:45 UTC 27 Feb 2009 23:13:39 UTC Over Success Done 14.48 0.04 0.00
ID: 13157 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Cluster Physik

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 08
Posts: 627
Credit: 94,940,203
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge13 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 13158 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 23:19:39 UTC - in response to Message 13150.  
Last modified: 27 Feb 2009, 23:33:44 UTC

http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/results.php?hostid=49916&offset=20

Hey, you are using the newest test version. How is it working with the lower CPU load?

And I've seen you try do do some green computing with your HD4870 ;)
As the memory uses quite some power but does not contribute significantly to the performance, you simply underclocked the memory to 350MHz to save some energy without loosing much performance.

Nice idea! How efficient is that approach working?
ID: 13158 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ

Send message
Joined: 27 Dec 07
Posts: 14
Credit: 5,089,974
RAC: 0
5 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13163 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 23:35:44 UTC

The CPU load average is about 2 - 6% on a dualcore, it's very nice and the application is stable. I don't see any difference of performance with the other versions of 0.19

In fact my GPU is an gainward HD4850 "golden sample" oced to 750mhz and yes my memory is underclocked (1100mhz to 350mhz) to kill some watts :) I won 16w and I didn't see any difference :)
ID: 13163 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Misfit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 07
Posts: 915
Credit: 1,503,319
RAC: 0
1 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13217 - Posted: 28 Feb 2009, 3:15:00 UTC - in response to Message 13163.  


me@rescam.org
ID: 13217 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Pwrguru

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 08
Posts: 24
Credit: 250,053,699
RAC: 0
200 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13237 - Posted: 28 Feb 2009, 8:58:25 UTC

I am seeing a lot more invalid work units.....It is running about every 6th work unit on my quad core running 8 tasks.....
ID: 13237 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13337 - Posted: 28 Feb 2009, 15:55:39 UTC - in response to Message 13237.  

I am seeing a lot more invalid work units.....It is running about every 6th work unit on my quad core running 8 tasks.....


Looks like the outlier detection i put in last night wasn't working quite right... it should be now.

A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications. So if it's still happening that might be why.
ID: 13337 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Pwrguru

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 08
Posts: 24
Credit: 250,053,699
RAC: 0
200 million credit badge13 year member badge
Message 13349 - Posted: 28 Feb 2009, 17:10:57 UTC

Things look a lot better now.......I haven't seen an invalid work unit the last couple of times I have checked...........
ID: 13349 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Cluster Physik

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 08
Posts: 627
Credit: 94,940,203
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge13 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 13414 - Posted: 28 Feb 2009, 22:52:34 UTC - in response to Message 13337.  

A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications.

If it's started on an unsupported card, it should not report any result a all (only a compute error).

Can you relate these wrong results to a certain set of WUs or parameters, or are just some hosts (maybe overclocking their cards too much) reporting strange fitness values? The worst thing would be just random errors.
ID: 13414 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileTravis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
10 thousand credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13423 - Posted: 28 Feb 2009, 23:20:21 UTC - in response to Message 13414.  

A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications.

If it's started on an unsupported card, it should not report any result a all (only a compute error).

Can you relate these wrong results to a certain set of WUs or parameters, or are just some hosts (maybe overclocking their cards too much) reporting strange fitness values? The worst thing would be just random errors.


some hosts are returning really weird values... like positive 8s and 9s from one host, another is returning values in the +130-140 range.
ID: 13423 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Cluster Physik

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 08
Posts: 627
Credit: 94,940,203
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge13 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 13438 - Posted: 1 Mar 2009, 0:49:19 UTC - in response to Message 13423.  

A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications.

If it's started on an unsupported card, it should not report any result a all (only a compute error).

Can you relate these wrong results to a certain set of WUs or parameters, or are just some hosts (maybe overclocking their cards too much) reporting strange fitness values? The worst thing would be just random errors.


some hosts are returning really weird values... like positive 8s and 9s from one host, another is returning values in the +130-140 range.

So most likely just some too high clocked cards. I guess they will lower the clocks if they get consistently 0 credits for such results ;)
ID: 13438 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGalaxyIce
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 08
Posts: 2018
Credit: 100,142,856
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13471 - Posted: 1 Mar 2009, 14:04:04 UTC - in response to Message 13438.  

A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications.

If it's started on an unsupported card, it should not report any result a all (only a compute error).

Can you relate these wrong results to a certain set of WUs or parameters, or are just some hosts (maybe overclocking their cards too much) reporting strange fitness values? The worst thing would be just random errors.


some hosts are returning really weird values... like positive 8s and 9s from one host, another is returning values in the +130-140 range.

So most likely just some too high clocked cards. I guess they will lower the clocks if they get consistently 0 credits for such results ;)

I've just knocked mine down a notch, just in case ;) Although I suspect my virus checker might have done something since I forgot to exclude it from my Boinc folder.


ID: 13471 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profilebanditwolf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 524,164
RAC: 0
500 thousand credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13476 - Posted: 1 Mar 2009, 14:52:27 UTC - in response to Message 13471.  


I've just knocked mine down a notch, just in case ;) Although I suspect my virus checker might have done something since I forgot to exclude it from my Boinc folder.


All your fault. Time to blame Ice! :P
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.
ID: 13476 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGalaxyIce
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 08
Posts: 2018
Credit: 100,142,856
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge14 year member badge
Message 13479 - Posted: 1 Mar 2009, 15:21:06 UTC - in response to Message 13476.  


I've just knocked mine down a notch, just in case ;) Although I suspect my virus checker might have done something since I forgot to exclude it from my Boinc folder.


All your fault. Time to blame Ice! :P

I've taken it back to the defaults. It wasn't me, honest gov.


ID: 13479 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : new searches, ps_X_10

©2022 Astroinformatics Group