Message boards :
Number crunching :
new searches, ps_X_10
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
let me know how the WUs for these are crunching here. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 09 Posts: 169 Credit: 6,734,481 RAC: 0 |
If we weren't back on insta-purge it would be easier to see how they are doing... |
Send message Joined: 4 Aug 08 Posts: 46 Credit: 8,255,900 RAC: 0 |
If we weren't back on insta-purge it would be easier to see how they are doing... or if there were wu's to get... "State # Results ready to send 0 Results in progress 128,286 Workunits waiting for validation 980" -jim |
Send message Joined: 27 Dec 07 Posts: 14 Credit: 5,089,974 RAC: 0 |
A lot of wu are granted to 0 because they are invalid ... http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/results.php?hostid=49916&offset=20 |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 09 Posts: 270 Credit: 124,346 RAC: 0 |
A lot of wu are granted to 0 because they are invalid ... But how to know that if they are purged instantly?? |
Send message Joined: 27 Dec 07 Posts: 14 Credit: 5,089,974 RAC: 0 |
A lot of wu are granted to 0 because they are invalid ... It's not instantly 12685202 12377796 27 Feb 2009 23:04:48 UTC 27 Feb 2009 23:13:04 UTC Over Success Done 1.98 0.01 13.77 On my second machine 12684102 12376726 27 Feb 2009 23:00:45 UTC 27 Feb 2009 23:13:39 UTC Over Success Done 14.48 0.04 0.00 |
Send message Joined: 26 Jul 08 Posts: 627 Credit: 94,940,203 RAC: 0 |
http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/results.php?hostid=49916&offset=20 Hey, you are using the newest test version. How is it working with the lower CPU load? And I've seen you try do do some green computing with your HD4870 ;) As the memory uses quite some power but does not contribute significantly to the performance, you simply underclocked the memory to 350MHz to save some energy without loosing much performance. Nice idea! How efficient is that approach working? |
Send message Joined: 27 Dec 07 Posts: 14 Credit: 5,089,974 RAC: 0 |
The CPU load average is about 2 - 6% on a dualcore, it's very nice and the application is stable. I don't see any difference of performance with the other versions of 0.19 In fact my GPU is an gainward HD4850 "golden sample" oced to 750mhz and yes my memory is underclocked (1100mhz to 350mhz) to kill some watts :) I won 16w and I didn't see any difference :) |
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0 |
me@rescam.org |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 08 Posts: 24 Credit: 250,053,699 RAC: 0 |
I am seeing a lot more invalid work units.....It is running about every 6th work unit on my quad core running 8 tasks..... |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
I am seeing a lot more invalid work units.....It is running about every 6th work unit on my quad core running 8 tasks..... Looks like the outlier detection i put in last night wasn't working quite right... it should be now. A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications. So if it's still happening that might be why. |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 08 Posts: 24 Credit: 250,053,699 RAC: 0 |
Things look a lot better now.......I haven't seen an invalid work unit the last couple of times I have checked........... |
Send message Joined: 26 Jul 08 Posts: 627 Credit: 94,940,203 RAC: 0 |
A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications. If it's started on an unsupported card, it should not report any result a all (only a compute error). Can you relate these wrong results to a certain set of WUs or parameters, or are just some hosts (maybe overclocking their cards too much) reporting strange fitness values? The worst thing would be just random errors. |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications. some hosts are returning really weird values... like positive 8s and 9s from one host, another is returning values in the +130-140 range. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jul 08 Posts: 627 Credit: 94,940,203 RAC: 0 |
A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications. So most likely just some too high clocked cards. I guess they will lower the clocks if they get consistently 0 credits for such results ;) |
Send message Joined: 6 Apr 08 Posts: 2018 Credit: 100,142,856 RAC: 0 |
A couple of the GPU apps are just returning rubbish however, I'm not sure if this is because they're working on an unsupported card, or just because of settings or conflicts with other applications. I've just knocked mine down a notch, just in case ;) Although I suspect my virus checker might have done something since I forgot to exclude it from my Boinc folder. |
Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0 |
All your fault. Time to blame Ice! :P Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. |
Send message Joined: 6 Apr 08 Posts: 2018 Credit: 100,142,856 RAC: 0 |
|
©2024 Astroinformatics Group