Message boards :
Number crunching :
Returned Invalid Result WHY??
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0 |
Just Reported 7 wu's got credit for 4 and three had this same message any one got any ideas??? Task ID 12752348 Name ps_s21_10_1598_1235787177_0 Workunit 12443549 Created 28 Feb 2009 2:12:59 UTC Sent 28 Feb 2009 2:14:03 UTC Received 28 Feb 2009 10:02:35 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 21898 Report deadline 3 Mar 2009 2:14:03 UTC CPU time 1450.188 stderr out <core_client_version>6.4.6</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Running Milkyway@home version 0.19 by Gipsel CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz (2 cores/threads) 1.66677 GHz (477ms) WU completed. It took 1450.19 seconds CPU time and 1471.34 seconds wall clock time @ 1.66678 GHz. </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 4.00614209266257 Granted credit 0 application version 0.19 |
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 647 Credit: 27,592,547 RAC: 0 |
Insta-purge makes it difficult to catch zero results.. but I saw at least one as well: Server state Over Lovely greetings, Cori |
Send message Joined: 24 Dec 07 Posts: 1947 Credit: 240,884,648 RAC: 0 |
Just had one myself http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=12666556 stderr out <core_client_version>6.6.11</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Running Milkyway@home version 0.19 by Gipsel CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.66GHz (4 cores/threads) 2.86366 GHz (450ms) WU completed. It took 441.313 seconds CPU time and 465.731 seconds wall clock time @ 2.86368 GHz. </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 2.26277234252794 Granted credit 0 application version 0.19 |
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0 |
Gday cori, Maybe Travis when he's back on deck might shed some light on whether it's a problem or not..... |
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 647 Credit: 27,592,547 RAC: 0 |
Gday cori, Hi Glenn, I hope so, too! ;-))) EDIT: Got the next one... Task ID 12985902 Lovely greetings, Cori |
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 647 Credit: 27,592,547 RAC: 0 |
Gday cori, EDIT2: And another one, grrrr.... ;-( Couldn't catch the stderr anymore but it must have been similar. Also I am noticing I'm getting these "Zeros" on all my comps now. Not every WU fails but it seems the failures are getting worse. Lovely greetings, Cori |
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0 |
Its only just started to happen in the last 3-4hrs but the last wu i managed to get a look it validated no problem?? So who knows maybe its because I use my lappy at the same time bionic is running... |
Send message Joined: 7 Nov 08 Posts: 14 Credit: 180,768,799 RAC: 0 |
WHY? IMHO, new code of assimilator/validator. I've been debugging the new code for the assimilator/validator which lets us do some validation of workunits to keep our searches from getting screwed up by invalid results. This has caused the server to crash quite a few times this evening, so that might be causing a lot of the lack of work. http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_reply.php?thread=669&post=13221#13221 |
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0 |
Ahhh..... could be thats the problem...Just got 10 new tasks so work isnt an issue. Hopefully you can get on top of the problem good luck better you than me...:)) |
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 647 Credit: 27,592,547 RAC: 0 |
WHY? IMHO, new code of assimilator/validator... Hm, but does that explain why the same type of WU (for example s79) is successful one time and fails the next time (maybe even on the same computer)? Anyway I'll better set MW to NNW for a while now. ;-) Lovely greetings, Cori |
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0 |
Already did that.. have to see how this plays out.. It seems the scheduler is working report 2 get 2 new things are looking up:)) |
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 486 Credit: 576,548,171 RAC: 1,260 |
I've been getting the Invalid Results across my Pharm too since I don't know when ??? Haven't been paying much attention until I read this Thread ... |
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 327 Credit: 116,463,193 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Feb 09 Posts: 45 Credit: 305,963 RAC: 0 |
Although I only started crunching yesterday, it seems approximately 20% of units are giving invalid results. The latest of mine gave this output file: 13100011 Name ps_s20_10_276033_1235824656_0 Workunit 12786412 Created 28 Feb 2009 12:37:40 UTC Sent 28 Feb 2009 12:38:39 UTC Received 28 Feb 2009 15:22:16 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 52343 Report deadline 3 Mar 2009 12:38:39 UTC CPU time 1025.5 stderr out <core_client_version>6.2.18</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 8.22933575814657 Granted credit 0 application version 0.18 |
Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0 |
Looks like these are the new ps_x_10 units that Travis put into work last night. This should go in that 'topic'. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
It looks like there was a problem with the outlier detection I turned on last night. It should be fixed now. |
Send message Joined: 15 May 08 Posts: 7 Credit: 126,077,128 RAC: 0 |
On my side I have not seen failed workunits during the last time. Before I was seeing about 10% failing |
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for the info Travis |
Send message Joined: 12 Aug 08 Posts: 253 Credit: 275,593,872 RAC: 0 |
An other completed but 0 credit. Task ID 13999811 Name ps_s22_11_90612_1235948692_0 Workunit 13656491 Created 1 Mar 2009 23:04:56 UTC Sent 1 Mar 2009 23:06:25 UTC Received 2 Mar 2009 1:32:16 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 42030 Report deadline 4 Mar 2009 23:06:25 UTC CPU time 1628.188 stderr out <core_client_version>6.1.0</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Running Milkyway@home version 0.19 by Gipsel CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz (2 cores/threads) 3.00676 GHz (744ms) WU completed. It took 1628.19 seconds CPU time and 1635.68 seconds wall clock time @ 3.00685 GHz. </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 5.83756219190251 Granted credit 0 application version 0.19 |
Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0 |
Got another invalid wu heres the output.... Task ID 21190736 Name ps_s21_12_97_1236789611_0 Workunit 20729076 Created 11 Mar 2009 16:40:16 UTC Sent 11 Mar 2009 16:47:06 UTC Received 12 Mar 2009 2:52:37 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 21898 Report deadline 14 Mar 2009 16:47:06 UTC CPU time 2953.141 stderr out <core_client_version>6.4.6</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Running Milkyway@home version 0.19 by Gipsel CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz (2 cores/threads) 1.66678 GHz (514ms) WU completed. It took 2953.14 seconds CPU time and 3050.98 seconds wall clock time @ 1.66678 GHz. </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 7.8103524526523 Granted credit 0 application version 0.19 |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group