Welcome to MilkyWay@home

12 simoultanous tasks running at 99% on 4870x2

Message boards : Number crunching : 12 simoultanous tasks running at 99% on 4870x2
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Thamir Ghaslan

Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 08
Posts: 61
Credit: 18,325,284
RAC: 0
Message 15931 - Posted: 18 Mar 2009, 8:23:11 UTC

<avg_ncpus>0.1</avg_ncpus>
<max_ncpus>4</max_ncpus>
<cmdline>n8</cmdline>

http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/result.php?resultid=26311777

I'm trying to push the card to a crashing point, considering the recommended setting is 256MB per wu, but too bad the server is dry and so far no crashes!

I've noticed GPU time is 30 - 40 seconds weather it was one task or multiple tasks!

ID: 15931 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
jedirock
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Nov 08
Posts: 178
Credit: 6,140,854
RAC: 0
Message 15964 - Posted: 18 Mar 2009, 15:27:07 UTC - in response to Message 15931.  

<avg_ncpus>0.1</avg_ncpus>
<max_ncpus>4</max_ncpus>
<cmdline>n8</cmdline>

http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/result.php?resultid=26311777

I'm trying to push the card to a crashing point, considering the recommended setting is 256MB per wu, but too bad the server is dry and so far no crashes!

I've noticed GPU time is 30 - 40 seconds weather it was one task or multiple tasks!


No, it's lower than 256MB/WU. I've inadvertently had 30 tasks running at once on my HD4870 1GB, which works out to less than 33MB/WU at least. This was with the 0.17 or 0.19b application, no 0.19d though, so I don't know if there's any change with that.
ID: 15964 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Cluster Physik

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 08
Posts: 627
Credit: 94,940,203
RAC: 0
Message 15976 - Posted: 18 Mar 2009, 16:48:10 UTC - in response to Message 15964.  

No, it's lower than 256MB/WU. I've inadvertently had 30 tasks running at once on my HD4870 1GB, which works out to less than 33MB/WU at least. This was with the 0.17 or 0.19b application, no 0.19d though, so I don't know if there's any change with that.

It depends on the WU. The ~18 credits WUs should need about 28MB, the 27-29 credits WUs about 37MB on the graphics card irrespective of the application version.
But one should not load the card to the max as this leads to slowdowns (reduced cache hit rate, swapping over PCI-Express) or even errors (if there is simply no memory left) and does not help the performance. Two or three (the default value) concurrent WUs are really the best to get maximum throughput on your GPU.
ID: 15976 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Thamir Ghaslan

Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 08
Posts: 61
Credit: 18,325,284
RAC: 0
Message 15982 - Posted: 18 Mar 2009, 17:31:25 UTC - in response to Message 15976.  


But one should not load the card to the max as this leads to slowdowns (reduced cache hit rate, swapping over PCI-Express) or even errors (if there is simply no memory left) and does not help the performance. Two or three (the default value) concurrent WUs are really the best to get maximum throughput on your GPU.



I'll stick with 3 then! If I'm to believe catlyst, 1 gets a below 50% utilization, 2 a 70%, and 3 fluctuate between 80-99!
ID: 15982 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : 12 simoultanous tasks running at 99% on 4870x2

©2024 Astroinformatics Group