Message boards :
Number crunching :
Compute Errors
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 |
I detached and reattached my PC, with the AGP HD3850, to run the WUs on it's CPUs. I now have 12 _3s_2_ WUs to crunch. So, there may be a few of thse around still. I only moved to this about an hour ago, so when this picks up new work I will look see if I only get the _1s_2's and the _2s_1s and _2s_2's first before moving back to the GPU. Go away, I was asleep |
Send message Joined: 8 Jan 09 Posts: 58 Credit: 53,721,984 RAC: 0 |
Gipsel got it fixed with version 0.19f: http://www.file-upload.net/download-1684038/Milkyway_0.19f_ATI.zip.html Vielen Dank Gipsel ! |
Send message Joined: 16 Feb 09 Posts: 109 Credit: 11,089,510 RAC: 0 |
Unrelated to the 3s workunits, I've noticed some odd behavior since updating my BOINC client to version 6.6.31. When I get some work from here on the ATI app it sits at ready to start instead of beginning immediately as it used to. I have to pause / resume the other project in progress for it to begin working GPU tasks in parallel with other CPU project work. Re-installing the ATI app did not fix the problem. I'll watch how it behaves for a little while and may have to roll back to an earlier BOINC version. I've left the supplied app_info.xml as default and it's worked fine in the past. Perhaps it may be necessary to specify some values now. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jul 08 Posts: 627 Credit: 94,940,203 RAC: 0 |
Gipsel got it fixed with version 0.19f I will make a link out of it. Version 0.19f of the ATI GPU application is ready for download. Besides the fix for the three stream WUs it reports now the GPU time as WU time. It was a really absurd bug, a missing line break in the GPU assembly (I edited the assembly after protyping it in a high level language). Because offline tools compiled it without problem (the compiler embedded to the graphics driver is obviously pickier) it was a bit hard to track that down in about 40kB assembly. But it works now. |
Send message Joined: 11 Nov 07 Posts: 232 Credit: 178,229,009 RAC: 0 |
Gipsel got it fixed with version 0.19f: Yes! thank you. You guys are just great and second to non in the BOINC community. Apparently you and the guys at Stanford are the only ones that know how to make programs that can put the ATI card to good use. |
Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0 |
:p that run of comics is great! Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. |
Send message Joined: 13 Feb 08 Posts: 1124 Credit: 46,740 RAC: 0 |
Gipsel got it fixed with version 0.19f: Aah. Not crap anymore then? |
Send message Joined: 19 May 09 Posts: 30 Credit: 1,062,540 RAC: 0 |
Gipsel got it fixed with version 0.19f THANK YOU ! Cluster Physik, you are doing a Great job with the ATI Apps ! I wish my other projects like Einstein would implement ATI instead of this focus on Cuda only nonsense. Bill |
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 08 Posts: 136 Credit: 319,414,799 RAC: 0 |
I just had an odd one. I updated to the new version. I finished ok but it got 0 credit. Here it is The odd thing it was a ps_sgr_208_2s_2 unit. 4870 GPU 4870 GPU |
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 327 Credit: 116,463,193 RAC: 0 |
I just had an odd one. I updated to the new version. I finished ok but it got 0 credit. Here it is The odd thing it was a ps_sgr_208_2s_2 unit. If you look in the result, it shows it as Invalid. Why, I don't know. Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now |
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 08 Posts: 136 Credit: 319,414,799 RAC: 0 |
Me either, I'm keeping an eye on it for a while to see if any others do the same. That's the first invalid unit i've had here. 4870 GPU 4870 GPU |
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 08 Posts: 136 Credit: 319,414,799 RAC: 0 |
I've just had another one on a diffrent system. Here it is, I'm not sure what's happening. Both are very stable systems. 4870 GPU 4870 GPU |
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 08 Posts: 136 Credit: 319,414,799 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 327 Credit: 116,463,193 RAC: 0 |
Someone mentioned that the new 0.19f app runs the GPU a little harder and a little hotter. Are your fans clean? Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now |
Send message Joined: 11 Nov 07 Posts: 232 Credit: 178,229,009 RAC: 0 |
Aah. Not crap anymore then? That was related to the new wu's and the fact that 2 months have gone after the message "Almost there!" on the 'Milkyway@Home for GPUs' page where the GPU application and discussions regarded that should take place. |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 |
Someone mentioned that the new 0.19f app runs the GPU a little harder and a little hotter. Are your fans clean? Yes! Very much so. Last week I was suffering overheating, and stripped down, removed PCs to outside and compressor cleaned all machines and the dust bunnies. The only PC with a MW compliant GPU had the GPU removed from the socket and separately cleaned. Interestingly, the PC is running just as heavily loaded now (98%), but the GPU temperature has dropped back to a normal (65C from 72C) and the GPU fan load has dropped to 47% from 55%. Perhaps it's the cooler weather. Go away, I was asleep |
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 08 Posts: 136 Credit: 319,414,799 RAC: 0 |
Yes, the fans are clean. One is a recent build and the other was just changed over into a new case and everything was cleaned before installing. Under load the cards are reporting temps of ~75C. Neither card is overclocked. Both systems are in Antec900 cases. Plenty of airflow there :-). I had several more return as invalid overnight. I didn't do a reboot after going to 19f yesterday at 2230. I just rebooted both systems at 1400 UTC today. I'm going to watch them for a bit and see if that makes any difference. <edit> Reboot made no difference. Still getting the occasional invalid result. Is anybody else having the same problem? I might suspect it was a computer issue if it wasn't happening on both systems. 4870 GPU 4870 GPU |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 |
Yes, the fans are clean. One is a recent build and the other was just changed over into a new case and everything was cleaned before installing. Under load the cards are reporting temps of ~75C. Neither card is overclocked. Both systems are in Antec900 cases. Plenty of airflow there :-). KWSN imcrazynow You made me look at my only GPU driven rig, and I am getting the odd invalid results as well. Three to be precise since UK lunchtime (13.30 - UTC+1). The successful WUs between them seem to be getting fewer before the next invalid result. I wonder what ti is? Go away, I was asleep |
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 327 Credit: 116,463,193 RAC: 0 |
I didn't have any last night, but now I just looked and have 6 out of almost 600 results on two machines. Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now |
Send message Joined: 4 Aug 08 Posts: 46 Credit: 8,255,900 RAC: 0 |
I've had a few between my two GPU boxes. But *maybe* 1 in 50 or less. Example: Task ID 74360632 Name ps_sgr_235_2s_1_674470_1244317010_0 Workunit 73253956 Created 6 Jun 2009 19:36:53 UTC Sent 6 Jun 2009 19:39:25 UTC Received 6 Jun 2009 19:52:15 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 24918 Report deadline 9 Jun 2009 19:39:25 UTC CPU time 84.34375 stderr out <core_client_version>6.4.6</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Running Milkyway@home ATI GPU application version 0.19f by Gipsel CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 cores/threads) 2.40002 GHz (259ms) CAL Runtime: 1.3.145 Found 1 CAL device Device 0: ATI Radeon HD 3800 (RV670) 512 MB local RAM (remote 28 MB cached + 512 MB uncached) GPU core clock: 669 MHz, memory clock: 829 MHz 320 shader units organized in 4 SIMDs with 16 VLIW units (5-issue), wavefront size 64 threads supporting double precision 3 WUs already running on GPU 0 No free GPU! Waiting ... 461.688 seconds. Starting WU on GPU 0 main integral, 160 iterations predicted runtime per iteration is 408 ms (33.3333 ms are allowed), dividing each iteration in 13 parts borders of the domains at 0 128 248 376 496 616 744 864 984 1112 1232 1360 1480 1600 Calculated about 3.70012e+012 floatingpoint ops on GPU, 6.34181e+007 on FPU. Approximate GPU time 84.3438 seconds. probability calculation (stars) Calculated about 1.20373e+009 floatingpoint ops on FPU. WU completed. CPU time: 19.9844 seconds, GPU time: 84.3438 seconds, wall clock time: 716.234 seconds, CPU frequency: 2.40012 GHz </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 0.364573240852738 Granted credit 0 application version 0.19 ----- -jim |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group