1) Message boards : Number crunching : New Benchmark Thread - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61817) Posted 1 Jun 2014 by WES Post: Hi and thanks for the info which'll make an interesting summer project as I plan on matching the 7950 TOP with an E8500 my g/son uses atm. The Boinc version is 7.2.42 and graphics driver is AMD Catalyst ver. 14-4.

2) Message boards : Number crunching : New Benchmark Thread - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61811) Posted 31 May 2014 by WES Post: Happy to see a new benchmark started, since I had to replace the card used in the previous test because one of the two fans seized. So I replaced the 7950 TOP with an R9 280X TOP (ASUS). It has a factory OC of 1070Mhz and 1600Mhz on the memory. I use the latest Boinc version and AMD graphics driver (not the beta) on Win7 64bit Pro. Run times to complete "106.88 credit WU's" average in 25sec range and I provided a link for reference. Regards, Wes. http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/results.php?userid=1017038&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid=

3) Message boards : Number crunching : Benchmark results - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61225) Posted 24 Feb 2014 by WES Post: Hey Mumac, v4.34 using now. Wow nice...tons of data at the scroll of the mouse. Looks like a keeper! Thanks for your work on this and will be looking out for updates. Regards, Wes

4) Message boards : Number crunching : Benchmark results - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61223) Posted 24 Feb 2014 by WES Post: sorry when I googled and went to the site it said last updated March 2013, I'll give it another try next chance I get... Regards, Wes

5) Message boards : Number crunching : Benchmark results - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61221) Posted 24 Feb 2014 by WES Post: Hi yes the vid card I have is the first Direct CUII model that first appeared Jan 2012 with factory setting 100MHz (900MHz) above reference model (800MHz). Version 2 came out late spring/early summer in 2012. AFAIK the first 7000 series models did not appear with the boost OC that appeared on 7000 series models some months later. Yea Yahoo is a place I don't frequent on the web so guess the screen shot thing will have to wait and I checked out the HWinfo site but it's not updated as frequently as GPU-Z or SIV64X but thanks for the tips guys. And forgive the cherry picks guess I didn't understand the "average of 5 WU times" or "average 5 of the longer 213.76 credit WUs only" parts completely, though its nice to see I can get occasional results matching cards with up to 200MHz higher OC. Regards, Wes

6) Message boards : Number crunching : Benchmark results - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61203) Posted 23 Feb 2014 by WES Post: OK, I went back and found all times and here are WU#'s and correlating data... WU-504486737 80.07 900MHz WU-504422737 80.07 900MHz WU-504396963 80.05 900MHz WU-504396643 80.05 900MHz WU-504316135 80.15 900MHz ...wow hope I did that right.. Wes

7) Message boards : Number crunching : Benchmark results - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61202) Posted 23 Feb 2014 by WES Post: Hi again folks, I just revisited the validation list and found and 80.04 recorded, so I investigated further the conical result of the WU and found that it list GPU at 925MHz!!! Yet, neither GPU-Z or SIV-64X both utilities I used for monitoring the system show 925MHz, they show only 900MHz! I will go back and check the conical results and see if indeed this is the case with other results I used...hmmm, I don't have OC enabled in Catalyst either so not sure what is going on here? Regards Wes Well I jumped the gun will post WU# with times as this 925 MHz was wingman's pc...disregard info above on this post.

8) Message boards : Number crunching : Benchmark results - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61201) Posted 23 Feb 2014 by WES Post: Yes I took the 5 fastest times of completed WU's (validated) from yesterday now there are 700+ validations so the 80s recorded are near the end of the stack so to speak. No 80s recorded since yesterday and hey if ya's can't trust a retired mailman, who in blazes can ya trust lol. If someone would walk me thru posting a screenshot of my GPU-Z pic I'd be more than happy to share. My sys... MB-ASUS P8Z68-VProGen3 i7-2700K @ 3.5GHZ 1050W Thermaltake Toughpower Grand PSU 16GB GSkill PC3 12800 RAM Zalman CNPS9900MAX-B 135mm CPU cooler Samsung 256GB SSD ASUS HD7950 CUII TOP 3GB Thermaltake Armor+ case w/3 140mm fans,1 120mm and 1 200mm fan ASUS Utility uninstalled sys temps < 80F constant cpu temps < 90F constant gpu temps <125F constant (at full load)

9) Message boards : Number crunching : Benchmark results - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61198) Posted 23 Feb 2014 by WES Post: [imgfile:///C:/Users/WES/Desktop/GPUZ%20screenie.gif][/img] Hi well tried to post image of GPU-Z screenie but obvious doing something wrong but yes no need to OC this, not only temps go up so does electric bill :) Wes

10) Message boards : Number crunching : Benchmark results - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 61193) Posted 23 Feb 2014 by WES Post: Greetings, new MW cruncher here and reading thru the different posts saw this and thought I might add to it. I'm using a ASUS HD7950-DC2T Direct CUII "TOP" model 7950 running factory settings (900MHz GPU/5000MHz RAM)and Cat. 14.1 Beta driver. Card will be two yrs old next month and doesn't owe me penny, just a well built machine. I've been member of S@H for yrs but since the WU's are sorta scarce there atm, decided to join the MW@H team. So apologies for being long-winded but decided to share my results... 80.05,80.07,80.07,80.05,80.15 = 80.078 avg. Regards, Wes

©2024 Astroinformatics Group