|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Client ignoring max threads
(Message 77672)
Posted 18 Oct 2025 by Conan
Post: Well the reset sort of worked. I now realize that there are both single threaded and multi-threaded applications available. With my app_config.xml I controlled this, but now that the project seems to be ignoring the app_config.xml file I am getting both types of work units. Deleting the app_config.xml file did not help as I am getting both work unit types. There is no setting to select single or multi threaded work units that I can see. Single thread work units can take over 10 hours. At least I get my hours up on WUProp@Home I may fiddle around with app_config.xml settings to block the single and just have MT, but I will see how it goes. Conan |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Client ignoring max threads
(Message 77669)
Posted 17 Oct 2025 by Conan
Post: The reset worked, working as per preferences Conan |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Client ignoring max threads
(Message 77666)
Posted 17 Oct 2025 by Conan
Post: Thanks Link I didn't realize that I could set the max thread option from my account preferences. So I deleted my app_config.xml, made the changes in my account for 8 threads and hit update on my computers. Well I was a bit disappointed with the result. Under my default location in my account I have 2 computers, one downloaded work units using 8 threads, the other downloaded work units using single threads. I have now set up an actual Home location and placed the one in the Default location in the Home location, will see what happens. I have reset that host but now am awaiting new work to test again. The one that had the single work units before has now downloaded work units that will use 8 threads so that seems OK. Conan |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Client ignoring max threads
(Message 77663)
Posted 17 Oct 2025 by Conan
Post: I have a host that is also ignoring my app_config.xml settings of 8 threads, which has worked for ages. It now runs on single threads for some reason. Had BOINC Manager reread my config files but this made no difference, still using 1 cpu thread. Conan |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
bad argument #0 to 'calculateEps2' (Expected 3 or 6 arguments)
(Message 77019)
Posted 5 Apr 2024 by Conan
Post: It looks as if orbit-fitting tasks in the new data feed (04_03_2024 in the task name) also have the problem that the previous feed (03_29_2024) had. (And like the previous data-set, the task names don't have "orbit_fitting" in them this time, which might hint at what the previous problem was!) No it isn't Conan |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why is this project using all 8 cores when another project is trying to run
(Message 76957)
Posted 6 Mar 2024 by Conan
Post: This project is using all eight available cores while another project is trying to run. Why is that? G'Day Richard, The default for N-Body work units is to use up to 16 cores in multi-thread. You can change this to what you want (2,3,4,5,6,7 whatever) using an app_config.xml file (placed in your MilkyWay project directory). Speed of processing may change you would have to try it out to see what works best. I currently use 8 cores so I can fit 3 work units at once on my 12 core 24 thread Ryzen CPU. See also This thread Conan |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Thread to report issues after server migration
(Message 76688)
Posted 7 Dec 2023 by Conan
Post: I rejoined after long absence and uploaded the new link. Now the work unit keeps getting stuck and the only solution is to reboot which is not always convenient, currently stuck for 3rd time after c.30% progress. WCG has the same issue after changing servers, but usually one reboot is enough Yes I limit them to 8 threads, otherwise it will use 16 by default. I can run 3 at a time. Have not had any issue with the stopping of the work unit and then not restarting. I will do the detach and re-attach maybe tomorrow or when I get round to it, same with SRBase and Einstein, who also want me to use a different url, works with the old one. Conan |
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Thread to report issues after server migration
(Message 76684)
Posted 7 Dec 2023 by Conan
Post: If I detach and re-attach to this project to correct the "milkyway-new" issue now that all my work units have been returned, do I use "http" as stated in the join link or do I use "https" as shown on the web search panel. I am guessing "https". Conan |
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Thread to report issues after server migration
(Message 76674)
Posted 1 Dec 2023 by Conan
Post: And these are some of the errors I get when trying to check my tasks (either from main account page or from directly from the Host page) This is just some as it goes for a few pages Warning: Attempt to read property "appid" on null in /home/boinc/boinc/milkyway/html/inc/result.inc on line 83 Warning: Attempt to read property "platformid" on null in /home/boinc/boinc/milkyway/html/inc/result.inc on line 84 Warning: Attempt to read property "user_friendly_name" on null in /home/boinc/boinc/milkyway/html/inc/result.inc on line 85 Warning: Attempt to read property "version_num" on null in /home/boinc/boinc/milkyway/html/inc/result.inc on line 86 Warning: Attempt to read property "version_num" on null in /home/boinc/boinc/milkyway/html/inc/result.inc on line 86 Warning: Attempt to read property "plan_class" on null in /home/boinc/boinc/milkyway/html/inc/result.inc on line 87 Warning: Attempt to read property "name" on null in /home/boinc/boinc/milkyway/html/inc/result.inc on line 92 Warning: Attempt to read property "appid" on null in /home/boinc/boinc/milkyway/html/inc/result.inc on line 83 If you keep scrolling past all the warnings the tasks do show Conan |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Thread to report issues after server migration
(Message 76646)
Posted 29 Nov 2023 by Conan
Post: Conan, Thanks Al, I managed to get this to work and thanks to you and Michael It worked so I have allowed the remaining work units to finish before I reset the project. As root I used echo 'text' | tee -a /file.txt > /dev/null to make the change (don't leave the 'nnn' around the text and put the file name in that you need) Conan |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Thread to report issues after server migration
(Message 76642)
Posted 28 Nov 2023 by Conan
Post: Marcin wrote:another issue to report! I, like a lot of others (or everyone), received the message that I had to change my URL from https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/ to http://milkyway-new.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/. I could not get work until I did this change. I was able to download work on both my computers but now I can't upload any results due the server no longer accepting my HOST NAME. So I was told to change from https to http not the other way round. Now I see a forum message that I will need to change it back again. There goes a heap of work that will benefit no one. Just what is the correct thing to do, or do I just drop this hot potato, lose the work and move on. In the NEWS section it states that the DNS has been changed to make milkyway-new to no longer exist. I noticed that my Master file in the BOINC directory has nothing in it at all. So BOINC no longer knows what to do with my results, URL no longer exists, my work is wasted, I can't return the results as it trying to send to a non existent URL, that was in existence just a day ago. Is there any editing I can do in the ACCOUNT file in BOINC that will allow me to return the work or do I now have to RESET the project AGAIN and lose all my work just to go back to where I was in the first place? I have suspended the remaining work units pending an answer here as I don't want to waste any more time on work that may be lost anyway. Conan |
|
12)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
15 CPUs cause running tasks to stop running
(Message 76299)
Posted 20 Jul 2023 by Conan
Post: mikey - for information: Just for information, 'Perf' work units can run on both Linux and Windows. I run them on my Linux computers along with CNode and OONI Probe. The only problem is I have to often hit update for OONI and Perf to download as CNode is the default. Project Admin has not worked out how to download all at once unfortunately. Conan |
|
13)
Message boards :
News :
Separation Application Shutting Down on Tuesday, Jun 20th
(Message 76216)
Posted 10 Jul 2023 by Conan
Post: The thing with Bench marking, in relation to BOINC, as that is what we are doing, it serves less purpose than when originally designed. With so many projects using fixed credit systems it is becoming redundant for use as a measure for granting credit. However for the projects that still use them, bench marks are used for the granting of credits and in some cases with a quorum of two required then it is often the lower claim that is awarded. This really comes to a head when you don't run bench marks as you get the default BOINC bench mark of 1 billion floating points and 1 billion drystones even if you have never run a bench mark in BOINC. This will always give you a very low credit claim and your so called wingman will (even if they have run bench marks) get a low awarded credit score as the lowest is awarded. So running a bench mark on the projects that use them does serve a purpose (for the granting of credit), for other BOINC projects that don't use them they serve no purpose and are not needed at all. Bench marks are supposed to be part of the BOINC software for the use of the CreditNew system to award credit. It does not work very well, YAFU only uses the default unmodified BOINC software and CreditNew. I recently ran a 16t work unit on my faster higher bench marking 7900X Ryzen system and it used all 24 threads for 9 hours (equal to about 7 days of processing) and got 1,450 odd points. I then ran an 8t work unit on my lower bench marked Ryzen 5900X and it ran for 8 hours using up to 24 threads (equal to about 5 days processing) and it was awarded 54,200 odd points. I can't figure that out, bench marks and CreditNew just don't work. Bench marks are not the be all and end all for the testing of a CPU, as no single bench mark does every thing (at least as far as I have seen), it there was a single bench mark that could test every thing then they would not have to run a "Test Suite" to see how a CPU preforms they could just run one programme. I don't need a bench mark to tell me that my Ryzen 5900X runs a programme at a slower pace than my Ryzen 7900X, it is obvious with the times taken. My computers are not hidden you can see the Bench Mark difference but they don't tell the whole story. Bench Marks, don't believe them. CreditNew, don't use it. Rant over, thanks for your time. Conan |
|
14)
Message boards :
News :
Separation Application Shutting Down on Tuesday, Jun 20th
(Message 76102)
Posted 29 Jun 2023 by Conan
Post: It can work though, depending on the project. I told BOINC I had 128 cores on my 12 core 24 thread Ryzen CPU so I could run YAFU work units of 32, 64 and 128 threads. Worked well, but I was a bit slow changing it back once my goal on YAFU had been reached and BOINC flooded my computer with work from other projects thinking I had 128 cores but I only had 24. The lucky thing about both cc_config.xml and app_config.xml files is that you can change it any time with BOINC still running then in BOINC Manager hit "Read Config Files" and it updates straight away. Conan |
|
15)
Message boards :
News :
Server Maintenance 6/28/2023 12 PM EDT (4 PM UTC)
(Message 76099)
Posted 29 Jun 2023 by Conan
Post: Thank you Tom, You have done a great job and I appreciate what you have done. I just got a heap of credit for work that I had written off as not going to get credit for and then I have it. Great work. People like you are the ones that make people stay at projects, active on the forums, responding to help requests, and actually doing something about it. Thanks again Conan |
|
16)
Message boards :
News :
Separation Application Shutting Down on Tuesday, Jun 20th
(Message 75886)
Posted 23 Jun 2023 by Conan
Post: Could the Admins just run the credit granting scrip to all pending Separation work units, and once done then flush all the Separation work units from the Data Base? I have over 1200 just sitting there and others would have many more. It would tidy things up a bit and then they could concentrate on the N-Body work. I will be back doing N-Body work units when some other commitments are met, wish they paid the same as the Separation work did. Conan |
|
17)
Message boards :
News :
Separation Project Coming To An End
(Message 75673)
Posted 18 Jun 2023 by Conan
Post: P.S. the ... post you made and I assume you wanted to delete it, changing to two spaces makes it go away. Weird, but it works. Thanks Peter, This tip is great and works well. Just deleted everything in a double posting that I had made then hit the space bar twice hit OK and the one I didn't want disappeared. Conan |
|
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
One WU using only 16 threads.
(Message 75672)
Posted 18 Jun 2023 by Conan
Post: I have a 12 core 24 thread Ryzen CPU, whenever I ran N-body work units only 1 would run and it would take 16 cores, when that one finished then another would start. Buggered up the work throughput as most would not be completed before the deadline. I added an app_config.xml file to make it use only 8 cores and now 3 will happily run and use all threads. I think 16 is the default, at least for me it was. In theory if you have 32 threads then it should run 2 work units but not sure about the default nature of the settings if it will then start another WU if one is already running. Conan |
|
19)
Message boards :
News :
Separation Project Coming To An End
(Message 75623)
Posted 16 Jun 2023 by Conan
Post: I only have CPU anyway so not a biggy for me, however I have now lost another project that runs on 32 bit windows which is really starting to limit options. However my 64 bit Linux machines can easily do N-Body work, it is just a pity that the credit is so low when 8 cores at a time are locked up on one work unit, and often give less points that a single Separation work unit would, and it uses just the one core. Conan |
|
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New team member lots of pendings or invalids.
(Message 71097)
Posted 3 Sep 2021 by Conan
Post: G'Day Rick, From what I can see, most of the Validaion Inconclusive work units are just waiting for a wingman to return their work so it can be compared to your work and then validated. They are marked as pending as they are still waiting on the other person. The invalids I am not sure about, possibly just not agreeing with the other person's returned result. Other people who know more might be able to expand on that. Conan |
©2026 Astroinformatics Group