1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
79XX Dont Run
(Message 52464)
Posted 14 Jan 2012 by sesef Post: with these drivers http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=356972 i have significant speedup, but there is bad news :( After drivers update I can't control card with Afterburner :( |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
HD7970 on the horizon ..
(Message 52454)
Posted 13 Jan 2012 by sesef Post: At the moment its running NVidia OpenCL app at around 52-53 seconds settings @1115/300. Which is a good time for a WU written to (principly) run on NVidia hardware. Try to run 2 wus in parallel, you should get few extra seconds :). Now I have about 43 sec/wu @1200/685 |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
HD7970 on the horizon ..
(Message 52433)
Posted 12 Jan 2012 by sesef Post: Some fun with 7970 best clock without voltage change best clock I think OC over 1200 Mhz is worthless. You can get 1200 Mhz without voltage change/with small change and get extra 3 sec. For 1300 Mhz I had to set almost 1,3V to speed up only 3 more seconds :(. |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
79XX Dont Run
(Message 52392)
Posted 11 Jan 2012 by sesef Post: I've made some tests with NV OpenCL app on Obix007's 7970. input milkyway_separation_0.82_windows_x86_64__cuda_opencl.exe -np 14 -p 0.3818788877972418000000000 30.0000000000000000000000000 -20.0000000000000000000000000 76.0000000000000000000000000 38.4090067002612400000000000 0.0000000000000000000000000 0.0000000000000000000000000 1.0000000000000000000000000 5.7985829621085900000000000 40.3449848062901640000000000 45.7000000000000000000000000 0.3401773264955795000000000 0.0000000000000000000000000 1.0000000000000000000000000 output 21:33:27 (3956): Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ATI 4770 work ... or not?
(Message 30294)
Posted 6 Sep 2009 by sesef Post: I have Asus 4770 Formula, and it work fine on cat 9.8 with win XP SP3 x86 and Win7 x64 |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
BOINC 6.10 support with ATI
(Message 29477)
Posted 18 Aug 2009 by sesef Post: When milky admins will upgrade server to newest version with ATI applications support? |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Small WUs is doing it again!
(Message 29174)
Posted 10 Aug 2009 by sesef Post: Hello MW@Home, I think mix with 2,5 degree and 5 degree wu's will be the best. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Question for you Win 7 guys
(Message 28996)
Posted 7 Aug 2009 by sesef Post: 9.7 with 4770 and win7 x64 run stable, and wu crunch faster than 9.5 |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Settings while running 2x 4870x2's
(Message 27545)
Posted 12 Jul 2009 by sesef Post: I see you can chrunch 4 WU on each GPU. What had you set run like that About commandline OxyOne have n2 w0.0 f20 |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
HD 4730
(Message 27219)
Posted 7 Jul 2009 by sesef Post: Someone have this card? It have double precision support and work with milky? |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Power Usage
(Message 24946)
Posted 11 Jun 2009 by sesef Post: Not mine but 1.65 kWh on 2x Xeon 3.6GHz + 2x4870x2 |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New faster application?
(Message 8392)
Posted 15 Jan 2009 by sesef Post: Beau in this folder you'll find file "out", last line of this file is your result. |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New faster application?
(Message 8375)
Posted 15 Jan 2009 by sesef Post: Faster applications returns incorrect results. Ahh you mean about this app, it returns correct results (same as oryginal app -3.046272445362277) |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New faster application?
(Message 8363)
Posted 15 Jan 2009 by sesef Post: Faster applications returns incorrect results. which applications do you mean? |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New faster application?
(Message 8355)
Posted 15 Jan 2009 by sesef Post: Faster applications returns incorrect results. MW-update18 SSE: fitness: -3.046289346362010 SSE2: fitness: -3.046289346362010 SSE3: fitness: -3.046289346362010 My CPU dont have SSSE3 and SSE4.1 instructions, so I cant test it. |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New faster application?
(Message 8348)
Posted 15 Jan 2009 by sesef Post: Faster applications returns incorrect results. Original app: fitness: -3.046272445362277 "Faster app": fitness: -3.046289346362010 |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group