41)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is anyone glad with the project?
(Message 10077)
Posted 8 Feb 2009 by Logan Post: Well... :) I think you don't knows.... |
42)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is anyone glad with the project?
(Message 10072)
Posted 8 Feb 2009 by Logan Post: Well... I like more to listennig the aliens...;) Do you know what your work is doing here...? |
43)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is anyone glad with the project?
(Message 10068)
Posted 8 Feb 2009 by Logan Post: Well... If all around here is like in SETI (credits, outages, etc...), I come back to SETI. Why I must been here if the thing is the same as in a 'real project'? |
44)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work being D/Led & no warning messages
(Message 9571)
Posted 2 Feb 2009 by Logan Post: I'm going to increase the WU queue (I bet that'll make a lot of people happy). The newton methods we're running right now aren't as sensitive to the work queue as the genetic search was. The question is about of the theorical crunch time calculated by the project and the correction factor what your BOINC manager applies... If the calculation of the task duration in the project's end is higher than reality and your real duration is too low, the DCF can falls under 0.02, and so no more work seconds could be requested until your cache is empty... As example... If a task are defined by the project as 6h (as DCF=1) task and stock app completes it in less of an hour (DCF= 1/6=0.16), and opti app could finish it in a few minutes, calculate..... Best regards. |
45)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is anyone glad with the project?
(Message 9406)
Posted 30 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Well... Please make your complains here... The only things what I hate are the constant changes of criteria to stablish what are the parameters of the project (credits, WUs length, limits...) Best regards. |
46)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is anyone glad with the project?
(Message 9321)
Posted 28 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Well... Please make your complains here... |
47)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
post milkyway_windows_intelx86 problems here
(Message 9145)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Looks like I got some Milkyway spillage into SETI. Do not expect that to continue well after your cut of credits... That's life... :) |
48)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 9143)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Sorry... it's like the sound of old refrigerator... All people heard it but don't gave any attemption... :) |
49)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 9136)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Thanks for the heads up there. I guess if you have the patience to go along with it until the Autumn, so can we. :-) And the credit tittles are for...:) |
50)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9125)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Starting a new thread for people to let out all their credit rage :) Don't think that your Social Engeneering of the book is working...:D :D :D :D :) |
51)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9120)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Travis you say this is an alpha project and if we can't handle it go elsewhere! I think maybe you need to start looking for some common sense. In alpha there are bound to be problems with the "Official" application amoung platforms, servers running properly, assimilators/validators working correctly and workunit production and distribution. Credit is relative. Brian, my friend, I think don't know about what we're talking... In March of the last year Crunch3r did an advice to the admins saying their app were working wrong... Some time after he makes an opti app what can be done the same work of stock (hours) in 30 seconds... Then, the admins takes the resolution to do a credits limit (only for the person who can reach it aka Crunch3r) Before all that, Crunch3r was the person what give to the project a lot off apps for the plattaforms that the project didn't support... Travis can confirm what I say... |
52)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9114)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: I'm done here until there is a level playing field as far as the apps go. The windows users are at a disadvantage as far as I can see. If there is an optimized app for them, then how about a sticky with links to the download site for all the optimized apps for each OS including specific instruction sets. And do you feel that is estrange...? :D :D :D :D You can tell yourself why... |
53)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9097)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: The solution for everything here is "we're still Alpha". So what in your terms constitutes it as a Beta? The same stock app was used for a couple months with no problems untill the last week or two. Isn't that what Beta is? Running consistently for given periods of time without many problems? Heck that alone beat numerous projects that can't go a week without having errors. Don't stress to Travis... or he could halve the credits another time...:D |
54)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
Norton Internet Security issue?
(Message 9087)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: I have Norton Internet Security and I didn't have any problems... |
55)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9078)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: And, to the comparation, in SETI, with AKV8 SSSE3 opti app I can get more than 35 - 40 credits/hour/core with an Q6600. (for to have an easy point of reference) Yes, I think that is a good idea to halve only your credits if that will make you happy. |
56)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9077)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Travis must to define openly his credits politics... Sorry I want to say per wu not per hour. and the especific numbers are 43-74 fixed credits in less of an hour per wu. Without a penalty for complete it too fast... See that machine by example (is not mine) |
57)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9073)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: Travis must to define openly his credits politics... Fixed credits...? There are not... were changed every time than an optimizer volunteer gave him a hint about how to improve/fix his faults... And every time is the half or more... (and the credits core/hour limit, the WUs in cache limit... etc) Things never saw in anyone project... He wants to compare his credits with SETI, but forget than SETI don´t have limits. I would like to see what could happen in SETI if they had set this limits...:D :D :D :D And, to the comparation, in SETI, with AKV8 SSSE3 opti app I was getting more than 35 - 40 credits/hour/core with an Q6600 in my SETI times. (for to have an easy point of reference) |
58)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9042)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post:
Don't esitate, Brian. Only was a joke... |
59)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9032)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: AND QUIT TESTING on the production side! If you can't test it, how you can decide what results are fine and what are wrong....? :D :D :D :D :D If you was working for a company, enterprise or how you named it, now you was fired... Please, for the future of the humanity, don't be IT developer... |
60)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9029)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Logan Post: No one has posted an optimized windows application for me to approve. I can't do anything in this matter -- it's up to the people who compile the windows apps and make them available. If they post an optimized application on one of our forums I'd be more than happy to verify it and sticky it for everyone. Your concept is wrong... the thing is work x credits... As easy to that... more work done, more credits... In less time? what about? it's more work... Your maths theacher don´t do well the work as I see... |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group