Welcome to MilkyWay@home

Posts by ultraZ

1) Message boards : Number crunching : New Benchmark Thread - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 69331)
Posted 5 Dec 2019 by ultraZ
Post:
RX3900 CPU 12 core 24 thread 51 min per WU per thread
Vega VII WU concurrent,, with 4 WU 12 S avg with .33 CPU per WU.

Edit Grammer
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Nbody without disabling GPU? (Message 67968)
Posted 27 Dec 2018 by ultraZ
Post:
Thanks, will look into the CPU commands in the link and will give it a try.
The two clients, one for GPU and CPU sounds less of a pain if i can figure it out, and if not I'll be back.
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Nbody without disabling GPU? (Message 67958)
Posted 21 Dec 2018 by ultraZ
Post:
sorry missed a bracket in copy past.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Nbody without disabling GPU? (Message 67957)
Posted 21 Dec 2018 by ultraZ
Post:
I am running a 1700xt with 16 Gig PC=3300 with 2 Vega Frontier 16g. I can't run N-Body with out it disabling my GPU's. I will post my XML file in case i miseed simthing please look below and post if we can do this,

Hope to get some help with my problem, thanks


pp_config>
<app>
<name>milkyway</name>
<gpu_versions>
<gpu_usage>0.25</gpu_usage>
<cpu_usage>0.25</cpu_usage>
</gpu_versions>
</app>
<app_config>
<app>
<name>milkyway_nbody</name>
<max_concurrent>1</max_concurrent>
<app_version>
<app_name>milkyway_nbody</app_name>
<plan_class>mt</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>12</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
</app>
</app_config>
5) Message boards : News : New MilkyWay@Home Developer (Message 67737)
Posted 29 Aug 2018 by ultraZ
Post:
Not having any problems with it taking 14 threads and 4 ati wu running concurrently.
6) Message boards : Number crunching : New Benchmark Thread - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new! (Message 66918)
Posted 2 Jan 2018 by ultraZ
Post:
CPU 1700x 3200mhz ram @ 3850mhz: GPU 1 290xt @ 1050mhz 4gb @ 1350mhz ram: 110s per two WU, .25 CPU use, or 65s single WU.

Same system:

GPU 1 7970 @ 1050mhz 3gb @ 1425mhz: 77s per two WU, .25 CPU use, or 45s single WU.


AMD users use two WU!!!
7) Message boards : Number crunching : Tips for making AMD 6970 run faster (Message 66916)
Posted 2 Jan 2018 by ultraZ
Post:
Well if you are getting 100 sec per WU or less. 6970 has good 64 performance. Using two Wu in parallel you are good. look if you are maintaining an even 100 percent work use in AMD/ATI control panel. Use two WU to maintain 100 GPU use.

I use .25 CPU per WU but i am using a 1700x at 3950 your CPU will matter.

/data/Bonic/milkyway.cs.rpi.edu_milkyway/app_config.xml

<app_config>
<app>
<name>milkyway</name>
<gpu_versions>
<gpu_usage>0.5</gpu_usage>
<cpu_usage>0.30</cpu_usage>
</gpu_versions>
</app>
</app_config>

Is what i would suggest
8) Message boards : News : New MilkyWay Separation Modified Fit Runs (Message 60470)
Posted 27 Nov 2013 by ultraZ
Post:
Running fine 2 x 7970's @ 1100. Points seem to reflect longer times. BM 7.2.28 x64, catalyst version 13.11
9) Message boards : Number crunching : HD6970 and HD4870 in one machine? (Message 46055)
Posted 7 Feb 2011 by ultraZ
Post:
You do have to have a monitor or a dummy plug hooked up to the 4870. Also you have to force it to run with a cc_config.xml

<cc_config>
<options>
<use_all_gpus>1</use_all_gpus>
</options>
</cc_config>

works fine in my setup, good luck.
10) Message boards : Number crunching : 6970 RAC? (Message 45917)
Posted 2 Feb 2011 by ultraZ
Post:
Thanks Beyond and loekaodas, It was the client I went from 109 sec to 74 sec, just by updating the client. Boy I wouldn't think it would affect it like that.

your help was appreciated.
11) Message boards : Number crunching : 6970 RAC? (Message 45912)
Posted 2 Feb 2011 by ultraZ
Post:
Been running this card for a month trying to pin the RAC, but its been hard with the WU server having problems keeping this card and a 4870 fed. Its looking to me a daily rate of 130,000 avg? Does anyone else have the card and can give me some feedback I was looking for a bigger boost I think my old 4870 gave me 90k.

Thanks,




©2020 Astroinformatics Group